Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31127912›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2019

Inconsistent Mammography Perceptions and Practice among Women of Over 40 Years in Iran

Fatemeh Pourhaji, Fazlollah Ghofranipour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fatemeh PourhajiHealth Education and Health Promotion Department, Faculty of Medical Science, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. Email: ghofranf@modares.ac.ir
Fazlollah GhofranipourHealth Education and Health Promotion Department, Faculty of Medical Science, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. Email: ghofranf@modares.ac.ir

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This paper aims to report the relationship between perceptions of mammography and screening practices. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted between May and September 2017, involving 400 women of over 40 years old, who was referred to as urban health centers in Tehran, Iran. The subjects were selected by multi-stage cluster sampling. Women with inconsistent mammography perceptions and practices were identified the Pros and Cons of mammography behavior for perceptions and Transtheoretical model (TTM) stage of adoption for prior and intended screening practices. The research instrument included a self-administered questionnaire and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and measures of central tendency, and the chi-square, T-tests, and correlation regression analysis. Results: The average age participant was 45.6±5.4. Consistent with the TTM and pros and cons of mammography, women in action tended to have more positive perceptions of mammography than women in pre-contemplation or contemplation (mean decisional balance: action= 16.8; SD, 1.4; contemplation=1.8; SD, 0.48; precontemplation= SD, 1.4;0.56; p<0.001). Conclusion: results of the current study indicate there are inconsistent mammography perceptions and practice among women in Iran, then we recommend that future intervention, consider setting factors in addition to standard perceptions focused counseling.

Indexed as

AdultAttitude to HealthCross-Sectional StudiesDecision MakingFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansIranMammographyMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPerceptionRegression AnalysisSurveys and QuestionnairesMammographyscreeningtranstheoretical model

Identifiers

PMID31127912
PMCPMC6857896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.