ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2019
Protecting the Privacy of Cancer Patients Using Fuzzy Association Rule Hiding
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Privacy protection in the medical field means the protection of individuals from being associated with undesirable conditions, diagnoses or treatments (Sensitive Attributes). The problem of knowledge discovery from health care data by applying data mining algorithms is inversely related to the privacy of individuals. Due to the tremendous growth of data in a large scale, there is a demand to protect the sensitive data accessible from medical datasets. Methods: This paper considers the problem of building privacy preserving association rule mining algorithm using the notion of TF * IDF derived from the information retrieval domain. The highly sensitive transaction is chosen using the product of Relative Item Frequency and Condensed Frequency. Finally, sensitive fuzzy data is perturbed to hide these refined rules. Results: It has been found that the number of non-sensitive rules lost as a side effect of hiding sensitive rule is 20% less and number of ghost rules is 30% less in proposed work than in previous work using Transactional Impact factor method. The execution time of hiding a rule is 26% lesser on an average in the proposed technique for various values of minimum confidence threshold. It has been observed that the number of modifications to the original dataset after hiding three rules were reduced by 66% in proposed method than in previous work. As the number of modifications to original data is less the chances of generating false association is also reduced. Conclusion: In this paper, a novel method was presented to hide the sensitive rule in quantitative data by decreasing the support of the RHS of the rule. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach is more efficient as it facilitates better rule hiding and minimizes the number of lost rules and ghost rules. Also, this approach makes minimum modifications to the dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.