Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31127894›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2019

Expression of DNA Damage Response Markers in Early-Onset or Familial Gastric Cancers

Hee Sung Kim, Jong Won Kim, In Gyu Hwang, Hye Seung Lee, Woo Ho Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Gastric epithelium frombioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Inhibition of DNA Repair in Cancer Therapy: Toward a Multi-Target Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hee Sung KimDepartment of Pathology, Chung-Ang Univesity, College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Jong Won KimDepartment of Surgery, Chung-Ang University, College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
In Gyu HwangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University, College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Hye Seung LeeDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.
Woo Ho KimDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. Email: woohokim@snu.ac.kr
Chung-Ang University · KRNational University College · PRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early-onset or familial gastric cancer (GC) is known to have clinicopathologic profiles different from those of sporadic GC. We aimed to compare DNA damage response marker expression between early-onset or familial GC and sporadic GC. Methods: GC samples were obtained from patients who underwent gastrectomy for GC at Seoul National University Hospital. Immunohistochemical analyses of various DNA damage response markers, including BRCA1, BRCA2, MRE11, RAD51C, and γH2AX, were performed using 54 early-onset GC, 59 familial GC, and 337 sporadic GC tissue microarray samples. Correlations between marker expression and clinicopathologic features were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses, and overall survival was analyzed. Results: The rate of γH2AX positivity was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in early-onset or familial GC than in sporadic GC. In contrast, the rates of MRE11 negativity and RAD51C negativity were significantly higher in sporadic GC than in early-onset or familial GC. BRCA1 negativity was associated with decreased overall survival in sporadic GC (p = 0.002), and MRE11 negativity was associated with decreased overall survival in sporadic GC (p = 0.012). Conclusion: Our results show significant differences in DNA damage response marker expression between early-onset or familial GC and sporadic GC.

Indexed as

DNA DamageGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseAdultAge of OnsetBiomarkers, TumorBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Repair EnzymesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastrectomyGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHistonesHumansBiomarkers, TumorBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Repair EnzymesH2AX protein, humanHistonesMRE11 Homologue ProteinMRE11 protein, humanRAD51C protein, humanDNA damage responseEarly-onset gastric cancerImmunohistochemistry

Identifiers

PMID31127894
PMCPMC6857889
OpenAlexW2945619983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.