Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31127861›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2019

Exploring women's preferences for HPV-based cervical cancer screening in South Africa.

Austin M Oberlin, Tafadzwa Pasipamire, Carla J Chibwesha

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cervical Cancer Screening Services in Nepal: A Descriptive Crosssectional Study.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Austin M OberlinDivision of Global Women's Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Tafadzwa PasipamireRight to Care, Helen Joseph Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Carla J ChibweshaDivision of Global Women's Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Helen Joseph Hospital · ZAUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

UJMT – ORWH – Gazzetta, Issa-BoubeD43TW009340 · FIC · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI William Checkley, Benjamin H. Chi · 2017 to 2026
$14.8M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009340UJMT Fogarty Global Health Fellows Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine preferences for HPV-based cervical cancer screening among South African women.

methodsA discrete choice experiment survey was conducted among 298 women who attended two public-sector clinics in South Africa from February 1 to May 31, 2018. Participants chose between hypothetical screening scenarios: method of swab collection (self or provider); timing of treatment (same day or return visit); type of clinic (static or mobile); cost of services (US $0 or US $4); and time spent at the clinic (30, 60, or 120 minutes). A logistic regression model was generated to evaluate the importance of each attribute. A market simulation analysis was performed to determine potential uptake of the various screening strategies.

resultsThe participants expressed strong preferences for free services (β=0.50; P<0.001) and same-day HPV testing and treatment (β=0.40; P<0.001). The market simulation indicated that 83.8% of women would be willing to undergo screening if services were free; the swab was collected by the provider; and treatment was offered at a return visit. Including same-day testing and treatment in the model increased uptake to 96.4%.

conclusionOffering same-day HPV testing and treatment could substantially improve uptake of cervical cancer screening in the South African public healthcare sector.

Indexed as

Patient PreferenceAdolescentAdultEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPapillomavirus InfectionsSouth AfricaSurveys and QuestionnairesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaginal SmearsCervical cancerCervical screeningDiscrete choice experiment surveyHPV test-and-treat approachPrimary HPV testingSelf-collected swab

Identifiers

PMID31127861
PMCPMC6610705
OpenAlexW2946643623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.