Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31127811›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2019

A photometric stereo-based 3D imaging system using computer vision and deep learning for tracking plant growth.

Gytis Bernotas, Livia C T Scorza, Mark F Hansen, Ian J Hales, Karen J Halliday, Lyndon N Smith, Melvyn L Smith, Alistair J McCormick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Explainable deep learning in plant phenotyping.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. ACORBA: Automated workflow to measureQuantitative plant biology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Deep Segmentation of Point Clouds of Wheat.Frontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  12. Network-based approaches for understanding gene regulation and function in plants.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gytis BernotasCentre for Machine Vision, Bristol Robotics Laboratory, University of the West of England, T block, Frenchay Campus, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK.
Livia C T ScorzaSynthSys & Institute of Molecular Plant Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, The King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3BF, UK.
Mark F HansenCentre for Machine Vision, Bristol Robotics Laboratory, University of the West of England, T block, Frenchay Campus, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK.
Ian J HalesCentre for Machine Vision, Bristol Robotics Laboratory, University of the West of England, T block, Frenchay Campus, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK.
Karen J HallidaySynthSys & Institute of Molecular Plant Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, The King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3BF, UK.
Lyndon N SmithCentre for Machine Vision, Bristol Robotics Laboratory, University of the West of England, T block, Frenchay Campus, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK.
Melvyn L SmithCentre for Machine Vision, Bristol Robotics Laboratory, University of the West of England, T block, Frenchay Campus, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK.
Alistair J McCormickSynthSys & Institute of Molecular Plant Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, The King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3BF, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M025551/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N005147/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N02334X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTracking and predicting the growth performance of plants in different environments is critical for predicting the impact of global climate change. Automated approaches for image capture and analysis have allowed for substantial increases in the throughput of quantitative growth trait measurements compared with manual assessments. Recent work has focused on adopting computer vision and machine learning approaches to improve the accuracy of automated plant phenotyping. Here we present PS-Plant, a low-cost and portable 3D plant phenotyping platform based on an imaging technique novel to plant phenotyping called photometric stereo (PS).

resultsWe calibrated PS-Plant to track the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana throughout the day-night (diel) cycle and investigated growth architecture under a variety of conditions to illustrate the dramatic effect of the environment on plant phenotype. We developed bespoke computer vision algorithms and assessed available deep neural network architectures to automate the segmentation of rosettes and individual leaves, and extract basic and more advanced traits from PS-derived data, including the tracking of 3D plant growth and diel leaf hyponastic movement. Furthermore, we have produced the first PS training data set, which includes 221 manually annotated Arabidopsis rosettes that were used for training and data analysis (1,768 images in total). A full protocol is provided, including all software components and an additional test data set.

conclusionsPS-Plant is a powerful new phenotyping tool for plant research that provides robust data at high temporal and spatial resolutions. The system is well-suited for small- and large-scale research and will help to accelerate bridging of the phenotype-to-genotype gap.

Indexed as

Deep LearningPlant DevelopmentArabidopsisImaging, Three-DimensionalPhenotypePhotometryArabidopsis thalianaleaf anglemachine learningnear-infrared LEDsphotomorphogenesissegmentationthermomorphogenesis

Identifiers

PMID31127811
PMCPMC6534809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.