Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31127714›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2019

Exploring User Needs and Preferences for Mobile Apps for Sleep Disturbance: Mixed Methods Study.

Melissa Aji, Christopher Gordon, Dorian Peters, Delwyn Bartlett, Rafael A Calvo, Khushnood Naqshbandi, Nick Glozier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Transparency and Efficiency through Digital Healthcare? Results of a Survey of Generation Y].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Ensuring patient and public involvement in the transition to AI-assisted mental health care: A systematic scoping review and agenda for design justice.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Melissa AjiBrain and Mind Centre, Central Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4497-888X
Christopher GordonCRC for Alertness, Safety and Productivity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2698-4864
Dorian PetersSchool of Electrical and Information Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4767-4198
Delwyn BartlettCentre for Sleep and Chronobiology, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Glebe, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9249-5773
Rafael A CalvoSchool of Electrical and Information Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2238-0684
Khushnood NaqshbandiSchool of Electrical and Information Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2646-2372
Nick GlozierBrain and Mind Centre, Central Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0476-9146

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobile health (mHealth) apps demonstrate promise for improving sleep at scale. End-user engagement is a prerequisite for sustained use and effectiveness.

objectiveWe assessed the needs and preferences of those with poor sleep and insomnia to inform the development of an engaging sleep app.

methodsWe triangulated results from qualitative (focus groups and app reviews) and quantitative (online survey) approaches. A total of 2 focus groups were conducted (N=9). An online survey tested themes identified from the focus groups against a larger population (N=167). In addition, we analyzed 434 user reviews of 6 mobile apps available on app stores.

resultsCommon focus group themes included the need to account for diverse sleep phenotypes with an adaptive and tailored program, key app features (alarms and sleep diaries), the complex yet condescending nature of existing resources, providing rationale for information requested, and cost as a motivator. Most survey participants (156/167, 93%) would try an evidence-based sleep app. The most important app features reported were sleep diaries (148/167, 88%), sharing sleep data with a doctor (116/167, 70%), and lifestyle tracking (107/167, 64%). App reviews highlighted the alarm as the most salient app feature (43/122, 35%) and data synchronization with a wearable device (WD) as the most commonly mentioned functionality (40/135, 30%).

conclusionsThis co-design process involving end users through 3 methods consistently highlighted sleep tracking (through a diary and WD), alarms, and personalization as vital for engagement, although their implementation was commonly criticized in review. Engagement is negatively affected by poorly designed features, bugs, and didactic information which must be addressed. Other needs depend upon the type of user, for example, those with severe insomnia.

Indexed as

mHealthmobile appssleep

Identifiers

PMID31127714
PMCPMC6707571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.