Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31127681›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2019

Health-care professionals' experiences of patient participation among older patients in intermediate care-At the intersection between profession, market and bureaucracy.

Linda Aimée Hartford Kvael, Jonas Debesay, Asta Bye, Astrid Bergland

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Assuring patient participation and care continuity in intermediate care: Getting the most out of family meetings using the four habits model.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Linda Aimée Hartford KvaelDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3551-2271
Jonas DebesayDepartment of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Asta ByeDepartment of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Astrid BerglandDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NOOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient participation is a key concern in health care. Nevertheless, older patients often do not feel involved in their rehabilitation process. Research states that when organizational conditions exert pressure on the work situation, care as a mere technical activity seems to be prioritized by the health-care staff, at the expense of patient involvement.

objectiveThe aim of this article is to explore how health-care professionals experience patient participation in IC services, and explain how they perform their clinical work balancing between the patient's needs, available resources and regulatory constraints.

designUsing a framework of professional work and institutional logics, underpinned by critical realism, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 health-care professionals from three IC institutions.

resultsIC appears as an important service in the patient pathway for older people with a great potential for patient participation. However, health care staff may experience constraints that prohibit them from using professional discretion, which is perceived as a threat to patient participation. Further, they may adopt routines that simplify their interactions with patients. Our results call for more emphasis on an individualized rehabilitation process and a recognition that psychological and social aspects are critical for patient participation in IC.

conclusionPatients interact in the face of conflicting institutional priorities or protocols. The study adds important knowledge about the practice of patient participation in IC from a front-line provider perspective. Underlying mechanisms are identified to understand and recommend how to facilitate patient participation at different levels in narrowing the gap between policy and clinical work in IC.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationAdultAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansIntermediate Care FacilitiesInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQuality of Health Careempowermentgeriatricspatient participationprofessional workquality of health carerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID31127681
PMCPMC6803410
OpenAlexW2946499020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.