Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31127680›Full record

ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2019

Measuring quality of antenatal care: a secondary analysis of national survey data from India.

L Singh, R Dubey, S Singh, R Goel, S Nair, P K Singh

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

L SinghICMR - National Institute of Medical Statistics, New Delhi, India.
R DubeyICMR - National Institute of Medical Statistics, New Delhi, India.
S SinghDivision of Reproductive Biology, Maternal and Child Health, Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, India.
R GoelDivision of Reproductive Biology, Maternal and Child Health, Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, India.
S NairICMR - National Institute of Medical Statistics, New Delhi, India.
P K SinghDivision of Preventive Oncology, ICMR - National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research, Noida, India.
National Institute of Medical Statistics · INIndian Council of Medical Research · INNational Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research · IN

Funding

Indian Council of Medical Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the coverage and adequacy of antenatal care services (ANC) available to women and examine the socio-economic determinants affecting service utilisation.

designSecondary data analysis of a population-based national survey.

settingIndia, 2015/16. SAMPLE: In all, 190 898 women between 15 and 49 years of age who had a live birth during the 5 years preceding the survey.

methodsOrdinal logistic regression. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE: Adequacy of ANC services received was measured under four categories - delivery of services by skilled personnel, timely provision of services, sufficiency and appropriateness of content. Quality of care was categorised as adequate ANC, inadequate ANC and no ANC.

resultsOnly 23.5% (95% CI 23.1-23.9%) of all women received adequate ANC, while 58.8% (95% CI 58.4-59.2%) received inadequate and 17.7% (95% CI 17.4-18.0%) received no ANC services. Regression analysis revealed that women belonging to the adolescent age group, illiterate women, and those in the poorest wealth quintile and in rural areas were less likely to receive any ANC.

conclusionThere is a need to improve the quality of ANC services. Currently, <25% of women of all ages receive adequate ANC. Socio-economic conditions play a vital part in determining the quality of care that women receive. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Nearly one out of four women in India received adequate ANC, nearly three in every five women received inadequate ANC and 18% lacked ANC for their recent live birth.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansIndiaLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedPregnancyPrenatal CareQuality of Health CareRetrospective StudiesSocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultIndiamaternal healthNational Family Health Survey 4quality of antenatal caresocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID31127680
OpenAlexW2944985415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.