Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31127494›Full record

ReviewTropical animal health and production2019

Resistance to ETEC F4/F18-mediated piglet diarrhoea: opening the gene black box.

Rebeka Sinha, Nihar Ranjan Sahoo, Kush Shrivastava, Pushpendra Kumar, Salauddin Qureshi, Ujjwal Kumar De, Amit Kumar, Gandham Venkata Papa Pydi Siva Ravi Kumar, Bharat Bhushan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Tropical animal health and production, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effect and Mechanism Analysis of PigInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Pig vaccination strategies based on enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli toxins.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Association of3 Biotech · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rebeka SinhaICAR- Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, 243122, U.P., India.
Nihar Ranjan SahooICAR- Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, 243122, U.P., India. vet.nihar@gmail.com.
Kush ShrivastavaICAR- Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, 243122, U.P., India.
Pushpendra KumarICAR- Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, 243122, U.P., India.
Salauddin QureshiICAR- Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, 243122, U.P., India.
Ujjwal Kumar DeICAR- Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, 243122, U.P., India.
Amit KumarICAR- Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, 243122, U.P., India.
Gandham Venkata Papa Pydi Siva Ravi KumarDBT-National Institute of Animal Biotechnology, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500032, India.
Bharat BhushanICAR- Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, 243122, U.P., India.
Indian Veterinary Research Institute · INNational Institute of Animal Biotechnology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diarrhoea, a significant problem in pig rearing industry affecting pre- and post-weaning piglets is caused by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC). The ETEC are classified as per the fimbriae types which are responsible for bacterial attachment with enterocytes and release of toxins causing diarrhoea. However, genetic difference exists for susceptibility to ETEC infection in piglets. The different phenotypes found in pigs determine their (pigs') susceptibility or resistance towards fimbrial subtypes/variants (F4ab, F4ac, F4ad and F18). Specific receptors are present on intestinal epithelium for attachment of these fimbriae, which do not express to same level in all animals. This differential expression is genetically determined and thus their genetic causes (may be putative candidate gene or mutations) render some animals resistant or susceptible to one or more fimbrial subtypes. Genetic linkage studies have revealed the mapping location of the receptor loci for the two most frequent variants F4ab and F4ac to SSC13q41 (i.e. q arm of 13th chromosome of Sus scrofa). Some SNPs have been identified in mucin gene family, transferring receptor gene, fucosyltransferase 1 gene and swine leucocyte antigen locus that are proposed to be linked mutations for resistance/susceptibility towards ETEC diarrhoea. However, owing to the variety of fimbrial types and subtypes, it would be difficult to identify a single causative mutation and the candidate loci may involve more number of genes/regions. In this review, we focus on the genetic mutations in genes involved in imparting resistance/susceptibility to F4 or F18 ETEC diarrhoea and possibilities to use them as marker for selection against susceptible animals.

Indexed as

Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coliGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseAnimalsDiarrheaEscherichia coli InfectionsGenetic LinkagePolymorphism, Single NucleotideSwineSwine DiseasesAdhesion patternETECMucin 13Mucin gene familySwine leucocyte antigen

Identifiers

PMID31127494
OpenAlexW2946523265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.