Trial reportInternational journal of clinical oncology2019
A phase II randomized controlled study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin vs. gemcitabine and carboplatin for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (GOTIC003/intergroup study).
Trial report in International journal of clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A comprehensive comparison of medication strategies for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Maintenance Chemotherapy in Patients with Platinum-Sensitive Relapsed Epithelial Ovarian Cancer after Second-Line Chemotherapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Review
- Phase 1 trial of ADI-PEG 20 and liposomal doxorubicin in patients with metastatic solid tumors.Cancer medicine · 2022Article
- Impact of Value Frameworks on the Magnitude of Clinical Benefit: Evaluating a Decade of Randomized Trials for Systemic Therapy in Solid Malignancies.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021Article
- Suppressive effect upon carboplatin hypersensitivity reaction via pegylated liposomal doxorubicin combination therapy.International journal of clinical oncology · 2020Article
- Recurrent Treatment in Ovarian Cancer Patients: What Are the Best Regimens and the Order They Should Be Given?Current treatment options in oncology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability profiles of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin (PLDC) with those of gemcitabine and carboplatin (GC) for the treatment of patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.
methodsOvarian cancer patients with recurrence > 6 months after first-line platinum and taxane-based therapies were randomly assigned to PLDC [pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m
resultsOne-hundred patients (49 PLDC; 51 GC) were randomly assigned. Over a median follow-up of 24 months, the median progression-free survival was 12.0 months (95% CI 9.2-15.0) for PLDC and 9.8 months (8.9-12.3) for GC [HR 0.69 (0.455-1.047)] with a difference of 2.2 months. The response rate was 57.1% (41.0-72.3) for PLDC and 56.4% (39.6-72.2) for GC. No obvious differences in toxicity (G3/4) were noted between arms. The median relative dose intensity of planned dose per week was 88.9% for pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and 53.1% for gemcitabine (p < 0.0001).
conclusionsPLDC and GC are both good treatment candidates for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients; however, the dose intensity was lower for GC than for PLDC. PLDC had a more favorable risk-benefit profile than that of GC for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31127479What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.