Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31127446›Full record

ArticleMetabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society2019

Evaluation of sample preparation protocols for quantitative NMR-based metabolomics.

Olga A Snytnikova, Anastasiya A Khlichkina, Renad Z Sagdeev, Yuri P Tsentalovich

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Best Practices in NMR Metabolomics: Current State.Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Quantitative plasma profiling byFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Chemical shift variations in common metabolites.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Olga A SnytnikovaInternational Tomography Center SB RAS, Institutskaya 3a, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia. snytnikova_olga@tomo.nsc.ru.ORCID 0000-0001-9089-1924
Anastasiya A KhlichkinaInternational Tomography Center SB RAS, Institutskaya 3a, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.
Renad Z SagdeevInternational Tomography Center SB RAS, Institutskaya 3a, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.
Yuri P TsentalovichInternational Tomography Center SB RAS, Institutskaya 3a, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia. yura@tomo.nsc.ru.ORCID 0000-0002-1380-3000
Novosibirsk State University · RUInternational Tomography Center · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionQuantification of metabolites in biological fluids and tissues by NMR spectroscopy is challenged by the presence of abundant macromolecules and lipoproteins in samples, which give broad signals in the NMR spectra. To improve the quality of NMR spectra the different protocols for protein and lipid removal from the sample are used.

objectivesThis work is aimed at the evaluation of the effectiveness of various methods of purification of blood serum from proteins and lipids for

methodsThe advantages and limitations of different methods of the sample preparation for NMR-based quantitative metabolomics have been compared, including ultrafiltration, methanol and ethanol extractions with and without additional lipid removal, and methanol-chloroform extraction.

resultsThe concentrations of 30 abundant metabolites extracted from human blood serum have been measured. It is found that ultrafiltration provides the best lipid removal, but causes significant and inhomogeneous metabolite losses. Ethanol and methanol extractions demonstrate similar performance with the minimal metabolite losses, and are ideal for fluids and tissues with low lipid content. The additional purification of alcohol extracts from lipids allows for the significant improving of NMR spectra, but causes additional metabolite losses.

conclusionsThe methanol-chloroform extraction seems to be an optimal method for tissues with the high lipid content, providing a satisfactory lipid removal and low metabolite losses. The ultrafiltration leads to large losses of metabolites (up to 60%) and for this reason is not suitable for quantitative analysis.

Indexed as

MetabolomeChemical FractionationHumansLens, CrystallineMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMetabolomicsSerumUltrafiltration1H NMR spectroscopyMetabolites extractionQuantitative metabolomicsSerum

Identifiers

PMID31127446
OpenAlexW2945146903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.