ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2020
Comparative study of sacroiliac screw placement guided by 3D-printed template technology and X-ray fluoroscopy.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy comparison between iliosacral screw fixation of the posterior pelvic ring fracture with the assistance of modified percutaneous three-dimensional printing guide template and conventional fluoroscopy.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2023Trial
- Clinical efficacy and biomechanical analysis of robotic internal fixation with percutaneous screws in the treatment of both-column acetabular fractures.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evolution of the reduction technique for unstable pelvic ring fractures: a narrative review.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Clinical efficacy analysis of anterior superior iliac spine 3D-printed guide plate-assisted sacroiliac screw placement for the treatment of pelvic fractures.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Clinical significance of modified unilateral puncture percutaneous vertebroplasty guided by 3D- printed guides in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a retrospective study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- 3D bioprinting: a review and potential applications for Mohs micrographic surgery.Archives of dermatological research · 2024Review
- Article
- Percutaneous Sacroiliac Screw Fixation: A Modified Screw Insertion Method Using Just 2 Fluoroscopy Views.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2024Article
- Minimally invasive retrieval of intramedullary broken guidewire in distal tibia: An innovative technique.Trauma case reports · 2023Article
- Finite Element Analysis and Transiliac-Transsacral Screw Fixation for Posterior Pelvic Ring with Sacrum Dysplasia.Orthopaedic surgery · 2023Article
- Three-Dimensional Printing and Fracture Mapping in Pelvic and Acetabular Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Clinical applications and prospects of 3D printing guide templates in orthopaedics.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2022Review
- Use of a 3D-printed body surface percutaneous puncture guide plate in vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.PloS one · 2022Article
- Multimodal Neuroelectrophysiological Monitoring Combined with Robot-Assisted Placement of a Transiliac-Transsacral Screw for the Treatment of Transforaminal Sacral Fractures.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- Do three-dimensional modeling and printing technologies have an impact on the surgical success of percutaneous transsacral screw fixation?Joint diseases and related surgery · 2020Article
- A Systematic Scoping Review of Patient-specific Devices in Operative Management of Scaphoid Nonunion.JB & JS open accessReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the clinical effect of 3D-printed template technology with X-ray fluoroscopy in assisting surgery for sacroiliac screws placement.
designInstitutional review board-approved retrospective analysis. PATIENTS: The clinical data of 31 cases of sacroiliac complex injury between January 2015 and December 2016 were analyzed. There were 16 patients, males 11 and females 5, who underwent surgery assisted by 3D-printed template in template group, and that of contemporaneous 15 patients, males 11 and females 4, who underwent traditional surgery were gathered as fluoroscopy group. All those patients were followed up for more than 6 months.
main outcome measuresThe operation time and X-ray fluoroscopy times for each screw placement, and the Matta and Majeed score were analyzed and the difference between the two group was tested.
resultsAll cases were followed up for 6-20 months, average 11.4 ± 0.6 months. In template group, 19 screws were implanted. Each screw spent 25-38 min, average 27.2 ± 5.3 min, and need 2-5 times fluoroscopy, average 2.7 ± 0.5. The fracture reduction quality was evaluated by Matta score scale: excellent 10, well 4, fair 2, good rate 87.5%; and pelvic function were evaluated by Majeed score scale: excellent 11, well 3, fair 2, and good rate 87.5%. In fluoroscopy group, 17 screws were implanted. Each screw spent 45-70 min, average 60.3 ± 5.8 min, and needs 11-23 times fluoroscopy, average 15.4 ± 3.5. The fracture reduction quality was evaluated by Matta score scale: excellent 7, well 6, fair 2, and good rate 86.7%; and pelvic function was evaluated by Majeed score scale: excellent 6, well 6, fair 3, and good rate 80.0%. The difference in operation time, X-ray fluoroscopy times between template group and fluoroscopy group had statistical significance. But the Matta and Majeed score had no difference between two groups.
conclusionCompared with traditional surgery, 3D-printed template technology-assisted surgery for sacroiliac screws placement in sacroiliac complex injury patients possesses advantage such as shortened operation time and reduced X-ray exposure times. This technology improves the safety profile of this operation and should be further studied in future clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.