Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31127377›Full record

ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2019

Multiwell three-dimensional systems enable in vivo screening of immune reactions to biomaterials: a new strategy toward translational biomaterial research.

Sarah Al-Maawi, Carlos Mota, Alica Kubesch, C James Kirkpatrick, Lorenzo Moroni, Shahram Ghanaati

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah Al-MaawiFORM-lab, Department for Oral, Cranio-Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, Medical Center of the Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Carlos MotaMaastricht University, MERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Complex Tissue Regeneration Department, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Alica KubeschFORM-lab, Department for Oral, Cranio-Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, Medical Center of the Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
C James KirkpatrickFORM-lab, Department for Oral, Cranio-Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, Medical Center of the Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Lorenzo MoroniMaastricht University, MERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Complex Tissue Regeneration Department, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Shahram GhanaatiFORM-lab, Department for Oral, Cranio-Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, Medical Center of the Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany. shahram.ghanaati@kgu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7897-0854
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEMaastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vivo experiments are accompanied by ethical issues, including sacrificing a large number of animals as well as large costs. A new in vivo 3D screening system was developed to reduce the number of required animals without compromising the results. The present pilot study examined a multiwell array system in combination with three different collagen-based biomaterials (A, B and C) using subcutaneous implantation for 10 days and histological and histomorphometrical evaluations. The tissue reaction towards the device itself was dominated by mononuclear cells. However, three independent biomaterial-specific tissue reactions were observed in three chambers. The results showed a mononuclear cell-based tissue reaction in one chamber (A) and foreign body reaction by multinucleated giant cells in the other two chambers (B and C). Statistical analysis showed a significantly higher number of multinucleated giant cells in cases B and C than in case A (A vs. B; ***P < 0.001), (A vs. C; P < 0.01). These outcomes were comparable to previously published observations with conventional biomaterial implantation. The present data lead to the conclusion that this 3D screening system could be an alternative tool to enhance the effectiveness of in vivo experiments, thus offering a more economic strategy to screen biomaterial-related cellular reactions, while saving animals, without influencing the final outcome.

Indexed as

Foreign-Body ReactionAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCell Culture TechniquesCollagenGiant CellsImmune SystemInflammationMicePilot ProjectsSkinSwineTissue EngineeringTranslational Research, BiomedicalBiocompatible MaterialsCollagenMucodermMucograft

Identifiers

PMID31127377
OpenAlexW2945709152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.