Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31127369›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2019

[New therapy approaches, better outcomes? : Results from inception cohorts for patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis].

C Sengler

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

C SenglerProgrammbereich Epidemiologie, Arbeitsgruppe Kinder- und Jugendrheumatologie, Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland. sengler@drfz.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prospective cohort studies collect demographic and clinical data of newly diagnosed patients using standardized questionnaires and validated measuring instruments. Therefore, they are a valuable data source for evaluating disease progression, outcome parameters and predictors. In this article a selection of results from four inception cohorts on juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) are presented. In all cohorts, one half to three quarters of the patients achieved an inactive disease within the first year under observation but there were relevant differences between the different JIA categories. The time from symptom onset to diagnosis could be identified as an important predictor of this outcome. Data from the German JIA cohort showed that the health-related quality of life of patients and healthy control subjects had largely converged 3 years after inclusion. Young children with JIA and the detection of antinuclear antibodies have an increased risk of developing JIA-associated uveitis. Of these, the uveitis was inactive in approximately 80% after 1 year; however, at the time of diagnosis, almost 30% of patients already had uveitis-related complications. The previous therapy with methotrexate proved to be preventive for the development of uveitis. The early outcome of JIA patients is generally good. The differences in the JIA categories indicate the need to further individualize the therapy and to adapt it better to the risk profile of the individual patient. Data on long-term outcomes will provide information on which factors have a decisive influence on the course of the disease and how the care of children and adolescents with JIA can be further improved.

Indexed as

Arthritis, JuvenileUveitisAdolescentAntirheumatic AgentsBiological ProductsChildChild, PreschoolHumansMethotrexateProspective StudiesQuality of LifeAntirheumatic AgentsBiological ProductsMethotrexateComplicationsHealth-related quality of lifeMethotrexatePredictorsUveitis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.