Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31127366›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2019

Survival analysis of patients with metastatic osteosarcoma: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results population-based study.

Kehan Song, Jian Song, Kaiyuan Lin, Feiyan Chen, Xiaosheng Ma, Jianyuan Jiang, Feng Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Alkyl chain length-regulatedAsian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kehan SongDepartment of Orthopedics, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Jian SongDepartment of Orthopaedics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Kaiyuan LinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Feiyan ChenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaosheng MaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jianyuan JiangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. jianyuanjiang@126.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1684-2758
Feng LiDepartment of Orthopedics, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. lifenghust@126.com.
Fudan University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNTongji Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe present study is aimed at investigating whether (1) primary tumour surgery confers an improved survival on patients with metastatic osteosarcoma and (2) primary tumour surgery influences survival of patients with metastatic osteosarcoma differently according to primary tumour site.

methodsWe retrospectively identified 517 patients with high-grade, metastatic osteosarcoma in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 1994 and 2013. The effect of primary tumour surgery on survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analyses, log-rank tests, and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression modeling.

resultsOf those 517 patients with metastatic osteosarcoma in the cohort, 351 patients (68%) underwent primary surgery, and 166 patients (32%) did not undergo surgery. Primary tumour surgery was associated with increased overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.457, 95% CI 0.354-0.590, p < 0.001) and cancer-specific survival (HR = 0.422, 95% CI 0.325-0.550, p < 0.001). When we focused on different primary tumour sites, receipt of primary tumour surgery significantly prolonged the survival of patients with extremity osteosarcoma (p < 0.05 for overall and cancer-specific survival). However, for patients with pelvis/spine osteosarcoma, both univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that primary tumour surgery might not be associated with improved survival (p > 0.05 for overall and cancer-specific survival).

conclusionsOur study is the first population-based analysis to provide evidence of a favourable prognostic impact of primary tumour surgery on metastatic extremity osteosarcoma patients but not metastatic axial (pelvis/spine) osteosarcoma patients. Moreover, we found that surgery type (resection of the primary tumor without amputation vs. amputation) did not influence survival in patients with metastatic osteosarcoma.

Indexed as

AdultBone NeoplasmsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedOsteosarcomaPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesSEER ProgramUnited StatesMetastaticOsteosarcomaSurgerySurvival

Identifiers

PMID31127366
OpenAlexW2945011298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.