Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31127358›Full record

ReviewMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society2019

New models for human disease from the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium.

Pilar Cacheiro, Melissa A Haendel, Damian Smedley, International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium and the Monarch Initiative

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mouse phenome database: curated data repository with interactive multi-population and multi-trait analyses.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Xenbase: A Guide to the Xenopus Genetics and Genomics Knowledgebase.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A graph theoretical approach to experimental prioritization in genome-scale investigations.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2024
    Article
  9. Lethal phenotypes in Mendelian disorders.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2024
    Article
  10. Loss-of-functionJBMR plus · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Lethal phenotypes in Mendelian disorders.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. A review of standardized high-throughput cardiovascular phenotyping with a link to metabolism in mice.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pilar CacheiroWilliam Harvey Research Institute, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6335-8208
Melissa A HaendelLinus Pauling Institute and the Center for Genome Research and Biocomputing, Oregon State University, Corvallis, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9114-8737
Damian SmedleyWilliam Harvey Research Institute, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. d.smedley@qmul.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5836-9850
International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium and the Monarch Initiative
Queen Mary University of London · GBOregon State University · US

Funding

UM1HG006348: Cas9 Genome Integrity Supplemental ProposalUM1HG006348 · NHGRI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Jason D. Heaney, Chih-Wei Logan Hsu · 2016 to 2026
$47.5M
Mouse Phenotyping Informatics Infrastructure - MP12UM1HG006370 · NHGRI · EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY · PI Pilar Cacheiro Martinez, Helen Elizabeth Parkinson · 2016 to 2026
$20.4M
The Monarch Initiative: Linking Diseases to Model Organism ResourcesR24OD011883 · OD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HAENDEL, MELISSA A, MUNGALL, CHRISTOPHER J · 2012 to 2024
$16.0M
NHGRI NIH HHS UM1 HG006348NHGRI NIH HHS UM1 HG006370NIH HHS R24 OD011883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium (IMPC) continues to expand the catalogue of mammalian gene function by conducting genome and phenome-wide phenotyping on knockout mouse lines. The extensive and standardized phenotype screens allow the identification of new potential models for human disease through cross-species comparison by computing the similarity between the phenotypes observed in the mutant mice and the human phenotypes associated to their orthologous loci in Mendelian disease. Here, we present an update on the novel disease models available from the most recent data release (DR10.0), with 5861 mouse genes fully or partially phenotyped and a total number of 69,982 phenotype calls reported. With approximately one-third of human Mendelian genes with orthologous null mouse phenotypes described, the range of available models relevant for human diseases keeps increasing. Among the breadth of new data, we identify previously uncharacterized disease genes in the mouse and additional phenotypes for genes with existing mutant lines mimicking the associated disorder. The automated and unbiased discovery of relevant models for all types of rare diseases implemented by the IMPC constitutes a powerful tool for human genetics and precision medicine.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalPhenotypeAnimalsGenomeHumansMiceMice, KnockoutPrecision Medicine

Identifiers

PMID31127358
PMCPMC6606664
OpenAlexW2945275601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.