Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31127293›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2019

Microhomologies are prevalent at Cas9-induced larger deletions.

Dominic D G Owens, Adam Caulder, Vincent Frontera, Joe R Harman, Alasdair J Allan, Akin Bucakci, Lucas Greder, Gemma F Codner, Philip Hublitz, Peter J McHugh and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Establishment of CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Gigabase-scale deletion scanning of the human genome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Efficient Dual Cas9 Nickase Correction of a Prevalent PathogenicJID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Dominic D G OwensMRC Molecular Hematology Unit, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK.
Adam CaulderThe Mary Lyon Centre, MRC Harwell Institute, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0RD, UK.
Vincent FronteraMRC Molecular Hematology Unit, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK.
Joe R HarmanMRC Molecular Hematology Unit, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK.
Alasdair J AllanThe Mary Lyon Centre, MRC Harwell Institute, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0RD, UK.
Akin BucakciMRC Molecular Hematology Unit, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK.
Lucas GrederMRC Molecular Hematology Unit, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK.
Gemma F CodnerThe Mary Lyon Centre, MRC Harwell Institute, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0RD, UK.
Philip HublitzWIMM Genome Engineering Facility, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK.
Peter J McHughDepartment of Oncology, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK.
Lydia TeboulThe Mary Lyon Centre, MRC Harwell Institute, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0RD, UK.
Marella F T R de BruijnMRC Molecular Hematology Unit, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0902418Medical Research Council MC_UP_1502/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00016/2Medical Research Council MC_UU_12009/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CRISPR system is widely used in genome editing for biomedical research. Here, using either dual paired Cas9D10A nickases or paired Cas9 nuclease we characterize unintended larger deletions at on-target sites that frequently evade common genotyping practices. We found that unintended larger deletions are prevalent at multiple distinct loci on different chromosomes, in cultured cells and mouse embryos alike. We observed a high frequency of microhomologies at larger deletion breakpoint junctions, suggesting the involvement of microhomology-mediated end joining in their generation. In populations of edited cells, the distribution of larger deletion sizes is dependent on proximity to sgRNAs and cannot be predicted by microhomology sequences alone.

Indexed as

Chromosome DeletionCRISPR-Cas SystemsSequence DeletionAnimalsCell LineChromosome BreakpointsChromosomes, MammalianDeoxyribonuclease IDNA End-Joining RepairEndonucleasesGene EditingMiceModels, GeneticRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsDeoxyribonuclease IEndonucleasesRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems

Identifiers

PMID31127293
PMCPMC6698657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.