Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31127155›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Systems Pharmacogenomic Landscape of Drug Similarities from LINCS data: Drug Association Networks.

Aliyu Musa, Shailesh Tripathi, Matthias Dehmer, Olli Yli-Harja, Stuart A Kauffman, Frank Emmert-Streib

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aliyu MusaPredictive Society and Data Analytics Lab, Tampere University, Tampere, Korkeakoulunkatu 10, 33720, Tampere, Finland.
Shailesh TripathiPredictive Society and Data Analytics Lab, Tampere University, Tampere, Korkeakoulunkatu 10, 33720, Tampere, Finland.
Matthias DehmerDepartment for Biomedical Computer Science and Mechatronics, UMIT - The Health and Lifesciences University, Eduard Wallnoefer Zentrum 1, 6060, Hall in Tyrol, Austria.
Olli Yli-HarjaInstitute of Biosciences and Medical Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Korkeakoulunkatu 10, 33720, Tampere, Finland.
Stuart A KauffmanInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
Frank Emmert-StreibPredictive Society and Data Analytics Lab, Tampere University, Tampere, Korkeakoulunkatu 10, 33720, Tampere, Finland. frank.emmert-streib@tuni.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0745-5641

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern research in the biomedical sciences is data-driven utilizing high-throughput technologies to generate big genomic data. The Library of Integrated Network-based Cellular Signatures (LINCS) is an example for a large-scale genomic data repository providing hundred thousands of high-dimensional gene expression measurements for thousands of drugs and dozens of cell lines. However, the remaining challenge is how to use these data effectively for pharmacogenomics. In this paper, we use LINCS data to construct drug association networks (DANs) representing the relationships between drugs. By using the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification of drugs we demonstrate that the DANs represent a systems pharmacogenomic landscape of drugs summarizing the entire LINCS repository on a genomic scale meaningfully. Here we identify the modules of the DANs as therapeutic attractors of the ATC drug classes.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksDatabases, GeneticDatabases, PharmaceuticalData ScienceGene Expression ProfilingHumansPharmacogeneticsPharmacological PhenomenaSystems Biology

Identifiers

PMID31127155
PMCPMC6534546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.