Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31127037›Full record

ReviewProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

The role of the genome in experience-dependent plasticity: Extending the analogy of the genomic action potential.

David F Clayton, Ina Anreiter, Maria Aristizabal, Paul W Frankland, Elisabeth B Binder, Ami Citri

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
18.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Stress and Its Impact on the Transcriptome.Biological psychiatry · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 5 countries.

David F ClaytonProgram in Child and Brain Development, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, ON M5G 1M1, Canada; d.clayton@qmul.ac.uk ami.citri@mail.huji.ac.il.ORCID 0000-0002-6395-3488
Ina AnreiterProgram in Child and Brain Development, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, ON M5G 1M1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9563-0579
Maria AristizabalProgram in Child and Brain Development, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, ON M5G 1M1, Canada.
Paul W FranklandProgram in Child and Brain Development, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, ON M5G 1M1, Canada.
Elisabeth B BinderProgram in Child and Brain Development, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, ON M5G 1M1, Canada.
Ami CitriProgram in Child and Brain Development, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, ON M5G 1M1, Canada; d.clayton@qmul.ac.uk ami.citri@mail.huji.ac.il.ORCID 0000-0002-9914-0278
Canadian Institute for Advanced Research · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our past experiences shape our current and future behavior. These experiences must leave some enduring imprint on our brains, altering neural circuits that mediate behavior and contributing to our individual differences. As a framework for understanding how experiences might produce lasting changes in neural circuits, Clayton [D. F. Clayton,

Indexed as

Action PotentialsGenomeAnimalsBrainGene ExpressionGenes, Immediate-EarlyHumansMemoryNeuronal Plasticitygenomememoryplasticity

Identifiers

PMID31127037
PMCPMC7519304
OpenAlexW2944868509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.