Trial reportEpilepsy & behavior : E&B2019
One-year follow-up of a remotely delivered epilepsy self-management program in high-risk people with epilepsy.
Trial report in Epilepsy & behavior : E&B, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07628647 (Pilot Study of the Living Well With Brain Cancer Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Pilot Study of the Living Well With Brain Cancer Intervention
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Service delivery, behavioural, and self-management interventions for adults with epilepsy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical correlates of perceived stigma among people living with epilepsy enrolled in a self-management clinical trial.Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2024Trial
- Engaging stakeholders in the refinement of an evidence-based remotely delivered epilepsy self-management program for rural populations.Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2021Trial
- Self-Management Intervention for Adults with Epilepsy: A Systematic Review.Journal of epilepsy research · 2026Review
- Decreasing Emergency Department Visits for Children With Epilepsy.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2021Article
- Feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of an adopted novel self-management intervention among people with epilepsy in Uganda.Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2021Article
- Sleep duration and quality among U.S. adults with epilepsy: National Health Interview Survey 2013, 2015, and 2017.Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2021Article
- Psychological treatments for people with epilepsy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Review
- Bridging the divide between epilepsy and mental health to drive solutions.Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objective"Self-management for people with epilepsy and a history of negative health events" (SMART) is a novel group-format epilepsy self-management intervention demonstrated to reduce negative health events (NHEs) such as accidents, emergency department visits, and seizures in adults with epilepsy in a 6-month prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT); SMART also reduced depressive symptoms and improved health functioning and quality of life. This report describes the longer-term (12-month) post-efficacy RCT outcomes in adults with epilepsy who received SMART.
methodsAfter completing a 6-month, prospective RCT that demonstrated efficacy of SMART vs 6-month waitlist control (WL), adults ≥18 years of age with epilepsy were followed for an additional 12 months. Individuals originally randomized to WL received the 8-week SMART intervention immediately following the conclusion of the RCT. For this long-term extension analysis, assessments were conducted at 24 weeks (the 6-month primary outcome time-point of the efficacy RCT), at 32 weeks for individuals originally randomized to WL, and at 48 weeks and 72 weeks for all individuals. Outcomes assessed included past 6-month NHE counts, depressive symptoms assessed with the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and quality of life assessed with the 10-item Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE-10).
resultsAt the beginning of this long-term observational period (24-week follow-up time point for the original RCT), there were 50 individuals in the group originally randomized to SMART and 52 originally randomized to WL. Mean age was 41.4 years, 70% women (N = 71), 64% (N = 65) African-American, and 8% Hispanic (N = 8). Study attrition from week 24 to week 72 was 8% in the arm originally randomized to SMART and 17% in the arm originally randomized to WL. During the 12-month observation period (24 weeks to 72 weeks), there were a total of 44 serious adverse events and 4 deaths, none related to study participation. There was no significant change in total past 6-month NHE counts in the group originally randomized to SMART, although the group had significantly reduced 6-month seizure counts. The group originally randomized to WL, who received SMART during this observational period, had a reduction in total NHE counts. The group originally randomized to SMART had relatively stable levels on other outcome variables except for a trend for improved MADRS (p = 0.08). In the group originally randomized to WL, there were significant improvements in PHQ-9 (p = 0.01), MADRS (p ≤ 0.01), and QOLIE-10 (p = 0.004).
conclusionsThis post-RCT extension study suggests that adults with epilepsy who participate in the SMART intervention sustain clinical effects at 1-year follow-up and may have incremental improvements in seizure frequency and mood. Future research needs to identify opportunities for scale-up and outreach to other high-risk groups with epilepsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.