ArticleThe American surgeon2019
Evaluation of Chest Radiographs and Laboratory Testing during Melanoma Staging Procedures.
Article in The American surgeon, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Chest radiographs (CXRs) and laboratory testing have historically been performed as a part of low-risk melanoma (clinical stage 1/2) workup. This study evaluates the utility of routine CXRs and laboratory testing during the staging of clinical stage 1 and 2 melanoma patients. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Wake Forest University. A database of sentinel lymph node biopsies performed for clinical stage 1 or 2 melanoma was used to identify early-stage melanoma patients. The medical records of patients with melanoma were reviewed and preoperative workup procedures were recorded. Four hundred sixty-three patients were reviewed. A total of 315 patients underwent a preoperative CXR, whereas 309 received some laboratory testing. After sentinel node biopsies, 168 patients had pathologic stage 1 disease, 103 stage 2, and 44 stage 3. None of the CXRs (0%) correctly identified metastatic melanoma. Suspicious locations on CXRs and laboratory testing did not lead to metastatic findings in any patient within a year. Metastatic melanoma was not found in any patient by screening with CXRs or laboratory testing during preoperative workup. We recommend not conducting CXRs or laboratory testing during workup for surgical melanoma patients because of charges and anxiety these tests can cause. CXRs, blood tests, and metabolic panels have historically been ordered for early melanoma patients, although debate remains on their efficacy. Surgical patient records were retrospectively reviewed for these tests and no benefit was found.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31126364PMC6743493W3005919346What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.