Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31126335›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2019

Identifying patients' support needs following critical illness: a scoping review of the qualitative literature.

J King, B O'Neill, P Ramsay, M A Linden, A Darweish Medniuk, J Outtrim, B Blackwood

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04175717 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Is a Physiotherapy-led Follow-up Programme Feasible in Adult Critical Illness Survivors After Discharge Home: A Single-center Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorKantonsspital Winterthur KSWRan2020 to 2020Enrolled3ConditionsPost Intensive Care Unit SyndromeArmsphysiotherapy-led follow-up programme
NCT04375709 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Physical Performance in Individuals After COVID-19 Induced Hospitalisation and the Impact of a Standard Care Follow-up Program: a Longitudinal Observational Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorKantonsspital Winterthur KSWRan2020 to 2021Enrolled60ConditionsCovid-19 (New Coronavirus) InfectionArmsPhysical exercise, Education sessions
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Patients' Adaptations After Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Qualitative Study.American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses · 2021
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J KingFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
B O'NeillCentre for Health and Rehabilitation Technologies, INHR, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland, UK.
P RamsaySchool of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
M A LindenSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
A Darweish MedniukDepartment of Anaesthesia, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, England, UK.
J OuttrimDivision of Anaesthesia, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, UK.
B BlackwoodWellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland, UK. b.blackwood@qub.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4583-5381

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntensive care survivors suffer chronic and potentially life-changing physical, psychosocial and cognitive sequelae, and supporting recovery is an international priority. As survivors' transition from the intensive care unit to home, their support needs develop and change.

methodsIn this scoping review, we categorised patients' support needs using House's Social Support Needs framework (informational, emotional, instrumental, appraisal) and mapped these against the Timing it Right framework reflecting the patient's transition from intensive care (event/diagnosis) to ward (stabilisation/preparation) and discharge home (implementation/adaptation). We searched electronic databases from 2000 to 2017 for qualitative research studies reporting adult critical care survivors' experiences of care. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted and coded data. Data were analysed using a thematic framework approach.

resultsFrom 3035 references, we included 32 studies involving 702 patients. Studies were conducted in UK and Europe (n = 17, 53%), Canada and the USA (n = 6, 19%), Australasia (n = 6, 19%), Hong Kong (n = 1, 3%), Jordan (n = 1, 3%) and multi-country (n = 1, 3%). Across the recovery trajectory, informational, emotional, instrumental, appraisal and spiritual support needs were evident, and the nature and intensity of need differed when mapped against the Timing it Right framework. Informational needs changed from needing basic facts about admission, to detail about progress and treatments and coping with long-term sequelae. The nature of emotional needs changed from needing to cope with confusion, anxiety and comfort, to a need for security and family presence, coping with flashbacks, and needing counselling and community support. Early instrumental needs ranged from managing sleep, fatigue, pain and needing nursing care and transitioned to needing physical and cognitive ability support, strength training and personal hygiene; and at home, regaining independence, strength and return to work. Appraisal needs related to obtaining feedback on progress, and after discharge, needing reassurance from others who had been through the ICU experience.

conclusionsThis review is the first to identify the change in social support needs among intensive care survivors as they transition from intensive care to the home environment. An understanding of needs at different transition periods would help inform health service provision and support for survivors.

Indexed as

Qualitative ResearchSocial SupportAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultCritical IllnessFemaleHumansMaleStress, PsychologicalSurvivorsCritical illnessQualitative researchRecoveryScoping reviewSupport needs

Identifiers

PMID31126335
PMCPMC6533750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.