Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31126279›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2019

Patterns of internet and social media use in colorectal surgery.

Leonora E Long, Christopher Leung, Jonathan S Hong, Caroline Wright, Christopher J Young

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Internet search by the patients undergoing hernia surgery about the disease and surgeon selection.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leonora E LongSydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1759-4138
Christopher LeungDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
Jonathan S HongSydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Caroline WrightDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
Christopher J YoungSydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia. cyoungnsw@aol.com.
The University of Sydney · AURoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgeons use the Internet and social media to provide health information, promote their clinical practice, network with clinicians and researchers, and engage with journal clubs and online campaigns. While surgical patients are increasingly Internet-literate, the prevalence and purpose of searching for online health information vary among patient populations. We aimed to characterise patient and colorectal surgeon (CRS) use of the Internet and social media to seek health information.

methodsMembers of the Colorectal Society of Australia and New Zealand and patients under the care of CRS at the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, were surveyed. Questions pertained to the types of information sought from the Internet, the platforms used to seek it, and the perceived utility of this information.

resultsMost CRS spent 2-6 h per week using the Internet for clinical purposes and an additional 2-6 h per week for research. 79% preferred literature databases as an information source. CRS most commonly directed patients to professional healthcare body websites. 59% of CRS use social media, mainly for socialising or networking. Nine percent of surgeons spent > 1 h per week on social media for clinical or research purposes. 72% of surgeons have a surgical practice website. 43% of patients searched the Internet for information on their doctor, and 75% of patients sought information on their symptoms or condition. However, 25% used health-specific websites, and 14% used professional healthcare body websites. Around 84% of patients found the information helpful, and 8% found it difficult to find information on the Internet. 12% of patients used social media to seek health information.

conclusionsColorectal surgery patients commonly find health information on the Internet but social media is not a prominent source of health information for patients or CRS.

Indexed as

AdultAustraliaColorectal SurgeryDigestive System Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedNew ZealandSocial MediaSurgeonsSurveys and QuestionnairesAustraliaColorectal surgeryConsumer health informationInternetNew ZealandSocial mediaSurgeons

Identifiers

PMID31126279
PMCPMC6534933
OpenAlexW2947556913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.