ArticleBMC medical imaging2019
Multi-atlas active contour segmentation method using template optimization algorithm.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Self-Learning Network-based segmentation for real-time brain M.R. images through HARIS.PeerJ. Computer science · 2021Article
- Label fusion method combining pixel greyscale probability for brain MR segmentation.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Renal statistical map for positron emission tomography with [O-15] water.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBrain image segmentation is the basis and key to brain disease diagnosis, treatment planning and tissue 3D reconstruction. The accuracy of segmentation directly affects the therapeutic effect. Manual segmentation of these images is time-consuming and subjective. Therefore, it is important to research semi-automatic and automatic image segmentation methods. In this paper, we propose a semi-automatic image segmentation method combined with a multi-atlas registration method and an active contour model (ACM).
methodWe propose a multi-atlas active contour segmentation method using a template optimization algorithm. First, a multi-atlas registration method is used to obtain the prior shape information of the target tissue, and then a label fusion algorithm is used to generate the initial template. Second, a template optimization algorithm is used to reduce the multi-atlas registration errors and generate the initial active contour (IAC). Finally, a ACM is used to segment the target tissue.
resultsThe proposed method was applied to the challenging publicly available MR datasets IBSR and MRBrainS13. In the MRBrainS13 datasets, we obtained an average thalamus Dice similarity coefficient of 0.927 ± 0.014 and an average Hausdorff distance (HD) of 2.92 ± 0.53. In the IBSR datasets, we obtained a white matter (WM) average Dice similarity coefficient of 0.827 ± 0.04 and a gray gray matter (GM) average Dice similarity coefficient of 0.853 ± 0.03.
conclusionIn this paper, we propose a semi-automatic brain image segmentation method. The main contributions of this paper are as follows: 1) Our method uses a multi-atlas registration method based on affine transformation, which effectively reduces the multi-atlas registration time compared to the complex nonlinear registration method. The average registration time of each target image in the IBSR datasets is 255 s, and the average registration time of each target image in the MRBrainS13 datasets is 409 s. 2) We used a template optimization algorithm to improve registration error and generate a continuous IAC. 3) Finally, we used a ACM to segment the target tissue and obtain a smooth continuous target contour.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.