ReviewNutrients2019
Intraluminal Impact of Food: New Insights from MRI.
Review in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of dietary chickpea structures on the small intestine metabolome and microbiome: a randomised crossover trial.Nature communications · 2026Trial
- Evidence for the existence of theInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Article
- Advances in Nutritional and Therapeutic Strategies for Type 2 Intestinal Failure: A Narrative Review.Nutrition reviews · 2025Review
- Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Whole-Stomach Motility in Rats.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- Simulation of Antral Conditions for Estimating Drug Apparent Equilibrium Solubility after a High-Calorie, High-Fat Meal.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Variations in Bovine Milk Proteins and Processing Conditions and Their Effect on Protein Digestibility in Humans: A Review ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Dietary fibre in gastrointestinal health and disease.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2021Review
- Chemical Composition andNutrients · 2019Article
- Role of Fibre in Nutritional Management of Pancreatic Diseases.Nutrients · 2019Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding how the gut responds to food has always been limited by the available investigatory techniques. Previous methods involving intubation and aspiration are largely limited to liquid-only meals. The aim of this review is to describe how MRI has allowed analysis of the processing of complex multiphase meals. This has demonstrated the role of physical factors such as viscosity, fat and fibre content in controlling gastric secretion and motility. It has also allowed the description of changes induced in small bowel water content and the role of osmotic effects of poorly absorbed carbohydrates such as fructose, sorbitol and mannitol. Intestinal secretions can be shown to be stimulated by a range of fruit and vegetables and the effect of this on colonic water content can also be measured. This has been used to demonstrate the mode of action of commonly used laxatives including bran and psyllium. The wealth of data which can be obtained together with its non-invasive nature and safety makes the technique ideal for the serial evaluation of the impact of different nutrients and drugs in both health and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.