ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics2019
Social determinants of health affecting treatment of pediatric brain tumors.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Impact of social factors on outcomes following pediatric neuro-oncology surgery in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Disparities in pediatric cancer survivorship care: A systematic review.Cancer medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Racial and ethnic disparities among children with primary central nervous system tumors in the US.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Survivorship Care After Childhood Cancer: A Systematic Review of Reported Barriers and Facilitators.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterPooled it
- Association of area deprivation index (ADI) with demographics and postoperative outcomes in pediatric brain tumor patients.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024Observational
- Article
- Impact of social disparities on 10 year survival rates in paediatric cancers: a cohort study.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2023Article
- Impact of Social Determinants of Health in Spine Surgery.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2023Review
- Ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in survival of children and adolescents with CNS tumors in Southern Israel.Neuro-oncology practice · 2022Article
- Clinical Stakeholder Perspectives on Pediatric Inpatient Screening for Social Needs.Academic pediatrics · 2022Article
- Racial/ethnic, socioeconomic, and geographic survival disparities in adolescents and young adults with primary central nervous system tumors.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2021Article
- Evaluating palliative opportunities in pediatric patients with leukemia and lymphoma.Cancer medicine · 2021Article
- Financial Risk Protection for Neurosurgical Care in Indonesia and the Philippines: A Primer on Health Financing for the Global Neurosurgeon.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveLittle is understood about the role that health disparities play in the treatment and management of brain tumors in children. The purpose of this study was to determine if health disparities impact the timing of initial and follow-up care of patients, as well as overall survival.
methodsThe authors conducted a retrospective study of pediatric patients (< 18 years of age) previously diagnosed with, and initially treated for, a primary CNS tumor between 2005 and 2012 at Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt. Primary outcomes included time from symptom presentation to initial neurosurgery consultation and percentage of missed follow-up visits for ancillary or core services (defined as no-show visits). Core services were defined as healthcare interactions directly involved with CNS tumor management, whereas ancillary services were appointments that might be related to overall care of the patient but not directly focused on treatment of the tumor. Statistical analysis included Pearson's chi-square test, nonparametric univariable tests, and multivariable linear regression. Statistical significance was set a priori at p < 0.05.
resultsThe analysis included 198 patients. The median time from symptom onset to initial presentation was 30.0 days. A mean of 7.45% of all core visits were missed. When comparing African American and Caucasian patients, there was no significant difference in age at diagnosis, timing of initial symptoms, or tumor grade. African American patients missed significantly more core visits than Caucasian patients (p = 0.007); this became even more significant when controlling for other factors in the multivariable analysis (p < 0.001). African American patients were more likely to have public insurance, while Caucasian patients were more likely to have private insurance (p = 0.025). When evaluating survival, no health disparities were identified.
conclusionsNo significant health disparities were identified when evaluating the timing of presentation and survival. A racial disparity was noted when evaluating missed follow-up visits. Future work should focus on identifying reasons for differences and whether social determinants of health affect other aspects of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.