Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31125832›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2019

Intravital microscopy in mammalian multicellular organisms.

Seham Ebrahim, Roberto Weigert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Perfusion Window Chambers Enable Interventional Analyses of Tumor Microenvironments.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Multiphoton intravital microscopy of rodents.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Actually Seeing What Is Going on - Intravital Microscopy in Tissue Engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  13. Method for Acute Intravital Imaging of the Large Intestine in Live Mice.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Seham EbrahimLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 37 Convent Dr. Rm 2050B, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Roberto WeigertLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 37 Convent Dr. Rm 2050B, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA. Electronic address: weigertr@mail.nih.gov.

Funding

Molecular mechanisms of membrane remodelingZIABC011682 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI WEIGERT, ROBERTO · 2016 to 2025
$17.5M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011682
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging subcellular processes in live animals is no longer a dream. The development of Intravital Subcellular Microscopy (ISMic) combined with the astounding repertoire of available mouse models makes it possible to investigate processes such as membrane trafficking in mammalian living tissues under native conditions. This has provided the unique opportunity to answer questions that cannot be otherwise addressed in reductionist model systems and to link cell biology to tissue pathophysiology.

Indexed as

Intravital MicroscopyAnimalsEndocytosisExocytosisMammalsProtein Transport

Identifiers

PMID31125832
PMCPMC6726551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.