ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2019
Developing myelin specific promoters for schwannoma gene therapy.
Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deletion of themBio · 2026Article
- Identification of potential mechanisms of quercetin in diabetic peripheral neuropathy through integrated network pharmacology and experimental validation.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Directed evolution of novel AAV capsids for enhanced delivery to mouse and human Schwann cells.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026Article
- Adeno-associated viral vector targeted evolution for neurofibromatosis gene delivery.Trends in molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Gene replacement therapy in a schwannoma mouse model of neurofibromatosis type 2.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2022Article
- Schwannoma Gene Therapy via Adeno-Associated Viral Vector Delivery of Apoptosis-Associated Speck-like Protein Containing CARD (ASC): Preclinical Efficacy and Safety.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSchwannomas are peripheral nerve sheath tumors composed entirely of Schwann-lineage cells that cause pain and sensory-motor dysfunction through compression of peripheral nerves, the spinal cord, and/or the brain stem. Treatment of schwannoma is largely limited to resection which itself has limited value. The goal of this study is to establish a technique to identify the most efficient and tissue-specific promoter for use in a schwannoma gene therapy construct. NEW
methodThis work involves transfection of schwannoma cells with adeno-associated viral vector plasmids expressing GFP under different myelin cell specific promoters. The transfected cells were evaluated for green fluorescence intensity in vitro, and in vivo after implantation into sciatic nerves of nude mice.
resultsOur data demonstrate that myelin protein zero (MPZ, P0) and peripheral myelin protein 22 (PMP22) promoters produce greater GFP expression in schwannoma cell lines than myelin basic protein (MBP) promoter. In vitro, P0 promoter activity in schwannoma cell lines was shown to be less active than the cytomegalovirus and chicken β-actin (CBA) promoter. However, we did not observe any significant difference between the activity of the CBA and P0 promoters in a xenograft schwannoma model. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS(S): We show here the influence of the peripheral nerve microenvironment on promoter efficacy in expressing transgenes using simple transfection by lipofection followed by prompt implantation of the transfected cells into the sciatic nerve of nude mice.
conclusionsWe demonstrate that of the myelin specific promoters evaluated, P0 is optimal for driving expression of transgenes in schwannoma cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.