Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31125410›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society2020

First 12 Months of Life for Infants in New York City, New York, With Possible Congenital Zika Virus Exposure.

Ellen H Lee, Hannah Cooper, Martha Iwamoto, Maura Lash, Erin E Conners, Danielle Bloch, Sandhya Clark, Gili Hrusa, Hannah Kubinson, Marc Paladini and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Exanthema after travel abroad].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Ellen H LeeBureau of Communicable Disease, Division of Disease Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens, New York.
Hannah CooperBureau of Communicable Disease, Division of Disease Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens, New York.
Martha IwamotoBureau of Communicable Disease, Division of Disease Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens, New York.
Maura LashBureau of Communicable Disease, Division of Disease Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens, New York.
Erin E ConnersBureau of Communicable Disease, Division of Disease Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens, New York.
Danielle BlochBureau of Communicable Disease, Division of Disease Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens, New York.
Sandhya ClarkBureau of Communicable Disease, Division of Disease Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens, New York.
Gili HrusaBureau of Communicable Disease, Division of Disease Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens, New York.
Hannah KubinsonBureau of Communicable Disease, Division of Disease Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens, New York.
Marc PaladiniBureau of Communicable Disease, Division of Disease Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens, New York.
Emily McGibbonBureau of Communicable Disease, Division of Disease Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens, New York.
Jennifer L RakemanPublic Health Laboratory, Division of Disease Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York.
Anne D FineBureau of Communicable Disease, Division of Disease Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens, New York.
Ronald J LimbergerWadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany.
Dakai LiuPublic Health Laboratory, Division of Disease Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York.
Sally SlavinskiBureau of Communicable Disease, Division of Disease Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens, New York.
New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Zika Working Group

Funding

NCEZID CDC HHS U50 CK000407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur goal was to characterize the epidemiology and clinical significance of congenital Zika virus (ZIKV) exposure by prospectively following a cohort of infants with possible congenital exposure through their first year of life.

methodsWe included infants born in New York City between 2016 and 2017 who had or were born to a woman who had laboratory evidence of ZIKV infection during pregnancy. We conducted provider/patient interviews and reviewed medical records to collect information about the pregnant women and, for infants, clinical and neurodevelopmental status at birth and 2, 6, and 12 months of age.

resultsOf the 404 infants who met inclusion criteria, most (385 [95.3%]) appeared well, whereas 19 (4.7%) had a possible ZIKV-associated birth defect. Seven had congenital ZIKV syndrome, and 12 were microcephalic without other abnormalities. Although infants with congenital ZIKV syndrome manifested clinical and neurodevelopmental sequelae during their first year of life, all 12 infants with isolated microcephaly were normocephalic and appeared well by 2 months of age. Laboratory evidence of ZIKV was detected for 22 of the infants, including 7 (31.8%) with a birth defect. Among 148 infants without a birth defect and negative/no laboratory results on ZIKV testing, and for whom information was available at 1 year, 4 presented with a developmental delay.

conclusionsAmong infants with possible congenital ZIKV exposure, a small proportion had possible ZIKV-associated findings at birth or at follow-up, or laboratory evidence of ZIKV. Identifying and monitoring infants with possible ZIKV exposure requires extensive efforts by providers and public health departments. Longitudinal studies using standardized clinical and developmental assessments are needed for infants after possible congenital ZIKV exposure.

Indexed as

Pregnancy Complications, InfectiousZika VirusAntibodies, ViralDevelopmental DisabilitiesFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin MInfantInfant, NewbornInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalMaleMicrocephalyNew York CityPregnancyZika Virus InfectionAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin Mbirth defectscongenital Zika syndromemicrocephalysurveillanceZika virus

Identifiers

PMID31125410
PMCPMC7358042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.