Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31125107›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2019

Development and Validation of an Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Detection Model by Large-Scale MicroRNA Profiling.

Kazuki Sudo, Ken Kato, Juntaro Matsuzaki, Narikazu Boku, Seiichiro Abe, Yutaka Saito, Hiroyuki Daiko, Satoko Takizawa, Yoshiaki Aoki, Hiromi Sakamoto and 4 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kazuki SudoDepartment of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Ken KatoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Juntaro MatsuzakiDivision of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Narikazu BokuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Seiichiro AbeEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yutaka SaitoEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki DaikoDepartment of Esophageal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoko TakizawaDivision of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshiaki AokiDynacom Co, Mihama, Japan.
Hiromi SakamotoDepartment of Biobank and Tissue Resources, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Shumpei NiidaMedical Genome Center, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan.
Fumitaka TakeshitaFundamental Innovative Oncology Core Center, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahiro FukudaDepartment of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahiro OchiyaDivision of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
National Cancer Center Hospital East · JPNational Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology · JPToray Industries, Inc. (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Patients with late-stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) have a poor prognosis. Noninvasive screening tests using serum microRNAs (miRNAs) to accurately detect early-stage ESCC are needed to improve mortality. Objective: To establish a model using serum miRNAs to distinguish patients with ESCC from noncancer controls. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this case-control study, serum miRNA expression profiles of patients with ESCC (n = 566) and control patients without cancer (n = 4965) were retrospectively analyzed to establish a diagnostic model, which was tested in a training set and confirmed in a validation set. Patients histologically diagnosed as having ESCC who did not receive prior therapy or have a past or concurrent cancer other than ESCC were enrolled from the National Cancer Center Hospital in Tokyo, Japan. Between October 2010 and November 2015, control samples were collected from the National Cancer Center Biobank, the Biobank of the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, and the general population undergoing routine health examination. Data analysis was performed between August 2015 and October 2018. Serum samples were randomly divided into discovery and validation sets. Main Outcomes and Measures: The expression of 2565 miRNAs was assessed in each sample. The discriminant model (named the EC index) was evaluated in the training set using Fisher linear discriminant analysis with a greedy algorithm. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis evaluated the diagnostic ability of the model in the validation set. Results: In the training set, 283 patients with esophageal cancer (median age, 67 years [range, 37-90 years]; 83.4% male) were compared with 283 control patients (median age, 54 years [range, 22-100 years]; 43.1% male), and the EC index was constructed using 6 miRNAs (miR-8073, miR-6820-5p, miR-6794-5p, miR-3196, miR-744-5p, and miR-6799-5p). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 1.00, with sensitivity of 1.00 and specificity of 0.98. The validation set included 283 patients (median age, 66 years [range, 42-87 years]; 83.0% male) and 4682 control patients (median age, 68 years [range, 20-98 years]; 44.7% male), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the EC index was 1.00, with sensitivity of 0.96 and specificity of 0.98. Conclusions and Relevance: What appears to be novel serum miRNA discriminant model was developed for the diagnosis of ESCC. A multicenter prospective study is ongoing to confirm the present observations.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesEarly Detection of CancerEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaFemaleHumansMaleMicroRNAsMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID31125107
PMCPMC6632131
OpenAlexW2945442231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.