Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31125055›Full record

Trial reportClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2020

A Phase 2 Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of Two 3-Dose Regimens of a Clostridium difficile Vaccine in Healthy US Adults Aged 65 to 85 Years.

Nicholas Kitchin, Shon A Remich, James Peterson, Yahong Peng, William C Gruber, Kathrin U Jansen, Michael W Pride, Annaliesa S Anderson, Charles Knirsch, Chris Webber

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02561195 (A PHASE 2, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, RANDOMIZED, OBSERVER-BLINDED STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, AND IMMUNOGENICITY OF TWO 3-DOSE REGIMENS OF A CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE VACCINE IN HEALTHY ADULTS AGED 65 TO 85 YEARS), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02561195 phase2completednot on this map

A phase 2, placebo-controlled, randomized, observer-blinded study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of two 3-dose regimens of a clostridium difficile vaccine in healthy adults aged 65 to 85 years

TypeinterventionalSponsorPfizerRan2015 to 2020Enrolled300ConditionsClostridium Difficile Associated DiseaseArmsClostridium difficile Vaccine, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comprehensive Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of theThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2026
    Article
  8. AgainstToxins · 2025
    Review
  9. The Role ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Review
  10. Mechanisms ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. European Practice for CDI Treatment.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  17. Immunization Strategies Against Clostridioides difficile.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  18. Host Immune Responses toTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicholas KitchinPfizer Vaccine Clinical Research & Development, Hurley, United Kingdom.
Shon A RemichPfizer Vaccine Research & Development, Collegeville, Pennsylvania.
James PetersonFoothill Family Clinic, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Yahong PengPfizer Vaccine Research & Development, Collegeville, Pennsylvania.
William C GruberPfizer Vaccine Research & Development, Pearl River, New York.
Kathrin U JansenPfizer Vaccine Research & Development, Pearl River, New York.
Michael W PridePfizer Vaccine Research & Development, Pearl River, New York.
Annaliesa S AndersonPfizer Vaccine Research & Development, Pearl River, New York.
Charles KnirschPfizer Vaccine Research & Development, Pearl River, New York.
Chris WebberPfizer Vaccine Clinical Research & Development, Hurley, United Kingdom.
Pfizer (United States) · USPfizer (United Kingdom) · GBFoothill Family Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClostridium difficile causes toxin-mediated nosocomial diarrhea and community-acquired infections; no preventive vaccine is licensed. In this phase 2 study, we explored safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity in older US adults of an investigational bivalent C. difficile vaccine that contains equal dosages of genetically and chemically detoxified toxins A and B.

methodsConducted from July 2015 through March 2017, 855 healthy adults aged 65-85 years from 15 US centers were randomized 3:3:1 to receive vaccine (100 or 200 μg) or placebo at 0, 1, and 6 months (month regimen) or 1, 8, and 30 days (day regimen). Serum toxin A- and B-specific neutralizing antibodies were measured. Participant-reported local reactions (LRs) and systemic events (SEs), adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, newly diagnosed chronic medical conditions, and immediate AEs were recorded.

resultsThe 200-μg dose level elicited higher immune responses than the 100-µg dose level across regimens. Compared with the day regimen, the month regimen induced stronger and more persistent immune responses that remained elevated 12 months after dose 3. Responses peaked at month 7 (month regimen) and day 37 (day regimen). LRs (primarily injection site pain) were more frequent in vaccine recipients than controls; SE frequency was similar across groups. More related AEs were reported in the day regimen group than the month regimen group.

conclusionsThe C. difficile vaccine was safe, well tolerated, and immunogenic in healthy US adults aged 65-85 years. Immune responses were particularly robust in the 200-μg month regimen group. These results support continued vaccine development. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02561195.

Indexed as

Immunogenicity, VaccineAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, BacterialBacterial VaccinesClostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleUnited StatesVaccinationAntibodies, BacterialBacterial VaccinesadultsClostridium difficile infectionnosocomial diarrheatoxoid vaccineUnited States

Identifiers

PMID31125055
PMCPMC6912159
OpenAlexW2945111753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.