Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31124984›Full record

ArticleMedicine2019

Total laparoscopic duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection for solid pseudopaillary neoplasm of pancreas: A case report.

Bin Liang, Yuanyuan Chen, Mengyang Li, Xiaofeng Dong, Siyang Yao, Tianqi Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Bin LiangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.
Yuanyuan Chen
Mengyang Li
Xiaofeng Dong
Siyang Yao
Tianqi Liu
Apple (Israel) · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThere is controversy regarding the optimal surgical approach for pancreatic lesions in the head of the pancreas. Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection compared with pancreaticoduodenectomy is technically more challenging, but preserves more functional pancreatic tissue. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 25-year-old woman was admitted to our department on May 10, 2017. Computed tomographic's saw a 2.0 × 2.1-cm lesion located in the head of pancreas and its diagnosis was nonfunctional neuroendocrine tumors? The magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography scan demonstrated a solitary 1.6 × 1.7-cm lesion located in the head of pancreas, and its diagnosis was tumor. The patient's condition was good and symptomless, without any disease history. Physical examination and routine blood investigations were normal. All pancreatic malignant tumor biological markers were negative. DIAGNOSES: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of pancreas.

interventionsTotal laparoscopic head pancreatectomy with Roux-Y pancreaticojejunostomy was performed. OUTCOMES: The recovery was smooth after surgery. At the end of 20 months follow-up, she was well and showed no signs of recurrence. LESSONS: The anatomy of the operation is clearer and easier than open surgery because of the magnification effect of laparoscopy. Total laparoscopic head pancreatectomy is safe, effective, and feasible for solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of pancreas, and it should be equally applicable to some other pancreatic cystic neoplasms and neuro-endocrine tumors.

Indexed as

AdultDuodenumFemaleHumansLaparoscopyOrgan Sparing TreatmentsPancreasPancreatectomyPancreatic NeoplasmsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID31124984
PMCPMC6571397
OpenAlexW2946804433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.