SynthesisMedicine2019
Prognostic value of long noncoding RNA ROR in patients with cancer in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional Relevance of the Long Intergenic Non-Coding RNA Regulator of Reprogramming (Linc-ROR) in Cancer Proliferation, Metastasis, and Drug Resistance.Non-coding RNA · 2023Review
- Long non-coding RNA receptor activator of nuclear factor-κ B ligand promotes cisplatin resistance in non-small cell lung cancer cells.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Article
- Emerging Roles of Long Noncoding RNA Regulator of Reprogramming in Cancer Treatment.Cancer management and research · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFor cancer, it is common that there is usually a dysregulation of the long noncoding RNA regulator of reprogramming (LncRNA ROR). To illustrate the application of LncRNA ROR, which serves as the prognostic marker for the malignant tumors, it is of great importance to conduct a meta-analysis.
methodsThere were 3 databases being applied. The data used were collected before January 5, 2018. These 3 databases include the OVID, PubMed, and Science databse. To further explore the association between the expression and survival of LncRNA ROR, it calculated the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and hazard ratios (HRs). Meanwhile, the odds ratios (ORs) have been calculated for the evaluation of the correlation between the pathological and expression parameters of LncRNA ROR.
resultsThere were 8 researches participated by 720 patients. According to the HR, it has been implied that there was a high LncRNA ROR expression related with the weak disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 3.48, 95% CI, 2.24-5.41) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 2.47, 95% CI, 1.76-3.47) among the cancer patients with none dramatic heterogeneity. There was also a correlation among lymph node metastasis (OR = 5.38, 95% CI, 2.21-13.12), high tumor stage (OR = 3.80, 95% CI, 1.95-7.41), and larger tumor size (OR = 4.43, 95% CI, 1.26-15.51).
conclusionsThus, it can be predicted about the lymph node metastasis and high tumor stage, larger tumor size, DFS, and poor OS based on the high LncRNA ROR. This suggests that high LncRNA ROR can be used as a new indicator of poor prognosis in cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.