ArticleMedicine2019
Colonic mucinous adenocarcinoma causing intussusception and distant metastasis: A case report.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleCases of intussusception caused by mucinous carcinoma have been rarely reported, and those caused by colonic mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) with distant metastasis were even fewer. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 60-year-old woman who complained of severe pain around the navel with nausea and vomiting for a week was admitted on November 28, 2017. There were multiple watery stools and abdominal pain was worsened over the prior week. DIAGNOSIS: She was diagnosed by abdominal computed tomography, current medical history, and abdominal signs. Her initial diagnosis was acute abdomen, intussusceptions, and intestinal obstruction. The final diagnosis was MAC, which was based on postoperative pathology.
interventionsThe patient received emergency laparotomy, followed by 5 courses of chemotherapy with oxaliplatin plus capecitabine, and then 6 courses with 5-fluorouracil + oxaliplatin + calcium leucovorin. OUTCOMES: The patient was in good nutritional condition, and no obvious tumor recurrence or metastasis was found until July 9, 2018. LESSONS: Even though the prognosis of colonic MAC is poor, being able to receive timely surgical treatment, good nutritional status and reasonable postoperative chemotherapy are the key factors to prolonging patient's survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.