Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31124937›Full record

ArticleMedicine2019

Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery for FIGO stage IB2/IIA2 cervical cancer: A multi-center retrospective clinical study.

Hui Zhao, Yue He, Li-Rong Zhu, Jian-Liu Wang, Hong-Yan Guo, Ting Xu, Yi-Qin Wang, Ying Yao, Yu-Mei Wu

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Hui ZhaoDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Dongcheng District.
Yue HeDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Dongcheng District.
Li-Rong ZhuDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Peking University First Hospital.
Jian-Liu WangDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Peking University People's Hospital.
Hong-Yan GuoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ting XuDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Peking University First Hospital.
Yi-Qin WangDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Peking University People's Hospital.
Ying YaoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yu-Mei WuDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Dongcheng District.
Peking University · CNBeijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital · CNPeking University Third Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CNPeking University First Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compared the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by radical surgery (RS) vs primary surgical treatment (PST) in patients diagnosed with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB2/IIA2 cervical cancer.Data of 303 cervical cancer patients who received primary therapy for stage IB2/IIA2 cervical cancer at 7 medical centers in Beijing, China between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2016 and followed through December 31, 2017 were collected retrospectively. The response rates, surgical characteristics, and overall survival (OS) durations of patients who received NACT followed by RS were compared to those of patients who received PST.An improved short-term complete response rate was observed among patients who received intra-arterial chemotherapy compared with patients who had intravenous chemotherapy (18.3% vs 4.1%, Pdifference = .020). Patients who received NACT were more likely to undergo laparoscopic surgery and to have a lower blood loss volume (555.4 ± 520.2 ml vs PST, 682.5 ± 509.8 ml; P = .036) and increased estimated operative time (249.9 ± 101.9 vs PST, 225.1 ± 76.5 min; P = .022). No differences in high-risk factors (HRFs), the effects of supplemental treatment, or 5-year OS were observed between patients who received NACT and PST.Our findings indicate that patients who received NACT for FIGO stage IB2/IIA2 cervical cancer were more likely to undergo laparoscopic surgery. These findings have important implications regarding treatment with curative intent for stage IB2/IIA2 cervical cancer and warrant a further analysis of treatment strategies to ensure adequate treatment and patient-centered care.

Indexed as

AdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCervix UteriChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID31124937
PMCPMC6571268
OpenAlexW2946438596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.