ArticleMedicine2019
Effect of closed vacuum aspiration technique on lung collapse time in thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the effect of lung expansion and collapse method combined with closed vacuum aspiration technique on lung collapse time, reduce the waiting time of surgery.Forty patients with pulmonary peripheral nodules under thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy were divided into 20 cases of natural collapse group and 20 cases of modified collapse group. The natural collapse group used the traditional natural collapse method, and the modified collapse group used a lung expansion and collapse method combined with closed vacuum aspiration technique to record the lung collapse time and compare them.Thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy was successfully performed in both groups. The lung collapse time in the natural collapse group and the modified collapse group was 17.08 ± 1.35, 8.90 ± 0.39, respectively, P < .05.The lung expansion and collapse method combined with closed vacuum aspiration technique can reduced the waiting time of lung collapse during thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy, and can processed the inter-segment boundary better, thereby reduced the waiting time of surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.