Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31124709›Full record

ArticleBioTechniques2019

Triplicate PCR reactions for 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing are unnecessary.

Clarisse Marotz, Anukriti Sharma, Greg Humphrey, Neil Gottel, Christopher Daum, Jack A Gilbert, Emiley Eloe-Fadrosh, Rob Knight

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioTechniques, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Role of Vaginal Microbiota and OralBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Clarisse MarotzDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Anukriti SharmaDivision of Bioscience, Argonne National Laboratory University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Greg HumphreyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Neil GottelDivision of Bioscience, Argonne National Laboratory University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Christopher DaumDepartment of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA, USA.
Jack A GilbertDivision of Bioscience, Argonne National Laboratory University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Emiley Eloe-FadroshDepartment of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA, USA.
Rob KnightDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Funding

Saliva microbiota dynamics and role in metformin-mediated oral squamous cell carcinoma prophylaxisF31DE028478 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MAROTZ, CLARISSE A. · 2018 to 2020
$61k
NIDCR NIH HHS F31 DE028478
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional wisdom holds that PCR amplification for sequencing should employ pooled replicate reactions to reduce bias due to jackpot effects and chimera formation. However, modern amplicon data analysis employs methods that may be less sensitive to such artifacts. Here we directly compare results from single versus triplicate reactions for 16S amplicon sequencing and find no significant impact of adopting a less labor-intensive single-reaction protocol.

Indexed as

BacteriaDNA, BacterialPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNADNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencingmicrobiomePCRreplicate PCR reactions

Identifiers

PMID31124709
PMCPMC7030937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.