Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31124564›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2019

Resolving the Insertion Sites of Polymorphic Duplications Reveals a HERC2 Haplotype under Selection.

Marie Saitou, Omer Gokcumen

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Read mismapping from segmental duplications drives spuriousbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marie SaitouDepartment of Biological Sciences, SUNY at Buffalo.
Omer GokcumenDepartment of Biological Sciences, SUNY at Buffalo.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polymorphic duplications in humans have been shown to contribute to phenotypic diversity. However, the evolutionary forces that maintain variable duplications across the human genome are largely unexplored. We developed a linkage-disequilibrium based method to detect insertion sites of polymorphic duplications not represented in reference genomes. This method also allows resolution of haplotypes harboring the duplications. Using this approach, we conducted genome-wide analyses and identified the insertion sites of 22 common polymorphic duplications. We found that the majority of these duplications is intrachromosomal and only one of them is an interchromosomal insertion. Further characterization of these duplications revealed significant associations to blood and skin phenotypes. On the basis of population genetics analyses, we found that the duplication of a well-characterized pigmentation-related region, including the HERC2 gene, may be selected against in European populations. We further demonstrated that the haplotype harboring this duplication significantly affects the expression of the HERC2P9 gene in multiple tissues. Our study sheds light onto the evolutionary impact of understudied polymorphic duplications in human populations and presents methodological insights for future studies.

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationGenome, HumanPolymorphism, GeneticAnimalsGuanine Nucleotide Exchange FactorsHuman Genome ProjectHumansPan troglodytesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSelection, GeneticUbiquitin-Protein LigasesGuanine Nucleotide Exchange FactorsHERC2 protein, humanUbiquitin-Protein Ligasescopy number variationKRTnatural selectionstructural variants

Identifiers

PMID31124564
PMCPMC6587411
OpenAlexW2950337916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.