Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31124516›Full record

Trial reportIndian journal of ophthalmology2019

Retrobulbar dexmedetomidine in pediatric vitreoretinal surgery eliminates the need for intraoperative fentanyl and postoperative analgesia: A randomized controlled study.

Weidi Ye, Yuhan Hu, Yuntao Wu, Zhirui Zhu, Xiuming Jin, Zhiyong Hu

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The αASN neuro
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Weidi YeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Yuhan HuDepartment of Cell Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Yuntao WuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Zhirui ZhuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Xiuming JinDepartment of Anesthesiology and Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Zhiyong HuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Yale University · USSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the efficacy of retrobulbar ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine compared with systemic fentanyl in pediatric vitreoretinal (VR) surgery. Methods: This prospective double-blind, randomized controlled study was performed in 60 children undergoing VR surgery, age from 2 to 7 years. After general anesthesia, the following procedure was administrated: (1) retrobulbar block with 0.5% ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg (group RD, n = 20), (2) retrobulbar block with 0.5% ropivacaine (group RB, n = 20), and (3) control group with general anesthesia only (group F, n = 20). Hemodynamics, postoperative pain scores, anesthetics consumption (remifentanil, propofol, fentanyl), and emergence agitation were recorded. Results: Respiratory depression was observed in 7 of the 20 patients in group F after the laryngeal mask airway was removed in the operating room, compared with none in groups RD and RB. All patients in group F required intraoperative rescue fentanyl (average intraoperative fentanyl consumption, 26.6 ± 12.6 μg per patient). Some rescue fentanyl was required in group RB (three patients required one dose of rescue fentanyl). Patients in group RD required none. Groups RD and RB reported lower pain scores than group F at 4 h postoperatively (RD group: P < 0.001; RB group: P =0.002); pain scores in group RD were lower than that in group F at 6 h postoperatively (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Retrobulbar dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine is a safe and effective alternative to systemic fentanyl. This regimen provides better pain management, hemodynamic stability, and stress response suppression in pediatric VR surgery.

Indexed as

Unnecessary ProceduresAnalgesiaAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnalgesics, OpioidChildChild, PreschoolDexmedetomidineDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFentanylHumansInjections, IntraocularIntraoperative PeriodMaleNerve BlockPostoperative PainAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnalgesics, OpioidDexmedetomidineFentanylPediatricretrobulbar dexmedetomidineropivacainevitreoretinal surgery

Identifiers

PMID31124516
PMCPMC6552630
OpenAlexW2947407329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.