Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31124342›Full record

ArticleYonsei medical journal2019

Revisiting the Clinical Scoring System for the Prognosis of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps.

Jin Youp Kim, Young Eun Han, Yuju Seo, Goun Choe, Min Kyung Kim, Gene Huh, Deuktae Cho, Seung Koo Yang, Seung Heon Kang, Dae Woo Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Heterogeneity in the definition of chronic rhinosinusitis disease control: a systematic review of the scientific literature.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jin Youp KimDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Boramae Medical Center, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2687-6919
Young Eun HanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Boramae Medical Center, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5732-4303
Yuju SeoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Boramae Medical Center, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3578-0505
Goun ChoeDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Boramae Medical Center, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3839-2324
Min Kyung KimDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Boramae Medical Center, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9026-682X
Gene HuhDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Boramae Medical Center, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4487-1361
Deuktae ChoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Boramae Medical Center, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8927-9161
Seung Koo YangDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Boramae Medical Center, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3519-7395
Seung Heon KangDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Boramae Medical Center, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6569-825X
Dae Woo KimDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Boramae Medical Center, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. kicubi@daum.net.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5166-3072

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2017R1A2B4003445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the Japanese Epidemiological Survey of Refractory Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis (JESREC) classification, a clinical scoring system, for predicting disease control status in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and to investigate prognostic factors. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn total, 134 CRSwNP patients who underwent functional endoscopic sinus surgery after maximal medical treatment were enrolled. These patients were categorized into four groups according to JESREC classification: 1) non-eosinophilic CRSwNP (non-ECRSwNP), 2) mild eosinophilic CRSwNP (ECRSwNP), 3) moderate ECRSwNP, and 4) severe ECRSwNP. Disease control status among the patients was evaluated at 1 year after surgery, and the patients were divided into two groups (disease-controlled and disease-uncontrolled groups) for the investigation of prognostic factors.

resultsThere was no significant difference in disease control status between non-ECRSwNP and ECRSwNP groups (

conclusionNo difference in disease control status was identified between non-ECRSwNP and ECRSwNP cases. Tissue neutrophilia, however, appeared to be associated with disease control status in non-ECRSwNP cases, whereas tissue and blood eosinophilia was associated with ECRSwNP cases.

Indexed as

AdultChronic DiseaseEosinophilsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNasal PolypsNeutrophilsPrognosisRhinitisROC CurveSinusitiseosinophilsneutrophilsprognosisSinusitis

Identifiers

PMID31124342
PMCPMC6536397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.