Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31124171›Full record

ArticleJournal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine2019

Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis Response to Radiation After Microbubble Oxygen Delivery in a Murine Model.

Lauren J Delaney, Lorela Ciraku, Brian E Oeffinger, Corinne E Wessner, Ji-Bin Liu, Jingzhi Li, Kibo Nam, Flemming Forsberg, Dennis B Leeper, Patrick O'Kane and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lauren J DelaneyDepartment of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6794-9550
Lorela CirakuDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Brian E OeffingerSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Science, and Health Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Corinne E WessnerDepartment of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ji-Bin LiuDepartment of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jingzhi LiDepartment of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kibo NamDepartment of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8180-7284
Flemming ForsbergDepartment of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2215-1371
Dennis B LeeperDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Patrick O'KaneDepartment of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Margaret A WheatleySchool of Biomedical Engineering, Science, and Health Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Mauricio J ReginatoDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
John R EisenbreyDepartment of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Thomas Jefferson University · USDrexel University · US

Funding

Clinically Translatable Ultrasound-Sensitive Microbubble Approaches for Overcoming Tumor HypoxiaR01EB026881 · NIBIB · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI EISENBREY, JOHN, WHEATLEY, MARGARET A. · 2018 to 2021
$2.5M
Vevo 2100 ultrasound scannerS10OD010408 · OD · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI FORSBERG, FLEMMING · 2012 to 2012
$525k
Oxygen Microbubbles for Overcoming Hypoxic Tumor Resistance to RadiotherapyR21CA190926 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI EISENBREY, JOHN, O'KANE, PATRICK · 2015 to 2016
$387k
Ultrasound-Triggered Prophylaxis as a Novel Paradigm for Preventing Spinal InfectionF32AR072491 · NIAMS · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI DELANEY, LAUREN JO · 2018 to 2021
$189k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA190926NIAMS NIH HHS F32 AR072491NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB026881NIH HHS F32 AR072491NIH HHS R01 EB026881NIH HHS S10 OD010408Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHypoxic cancer cells have been shown to be more resistant to radiation therapy than normoxic cells. Hence, this study investigated whether ultrasound (US)-induced rupture of oxygen-carrying microbubbles (MBs) would enhance the response of breast cancer metastases to radiation.

methodsNude mice (n = 15) received stereotactic injections of brain-seeking MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells into the right hemisphere. Animals were randomly assigned into 1 of 5 treatment groups: no intervention, 10 Gy radiation using a small-animal radiation research platform, nitrogen-carrying MBs combined with US-mediated MB rupture immediately before 10 Gy radiation, oxygen-carrying MBs immediately before 10 Gy radiation, and oxygen-carrying MBs with US-mediated MB rupture immediately before 10 Gy radiation. Tumor progression was monitored with 3-dimensional US, and overall survival was noted.

resultsAll groups except those treated with oxygen-carrying MB rupture and radiation had continued rapid tumor growth after treatment. Tumors treated with radiation alone showed a mean increase in volume ± SD of 337% ± 214% during the week after treatment. Tumors treated with oxygen-carrying MBs and radiation without MB rupture showed an increase in volume of 383% ± 226%. Tumors treated with radiation immediately after rupture of oxygen-carrying MBs showed an increase in volume of only 41% ± 1% (P = 0.045), and this group also showed a 1 week increase in survival time.

conclusionsAdding US-ruptured oxygen-carrying MBs to radiation therapy appears to delay tumor progression and improve survival in a murine model of metastatic breast cancer.

Indexed as

Drug CarriersMicrobubblesAnimalsBrain NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleMiceMice, NudeOxygenRandom AllocationUltrasonographyDrug CarriersOxygencontrast-enhanced ultrasoundhypoxiaoxygen deliveryradiosensitivity

Identifiers

PMID31124171
PMCPMC7064157
OpenAlexW2946762906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.