ArticleScandinavian journal of psychology2019
Physicians' gender bias in the diagnostic assessment of medically unexplained symptoms and its effect on patient-physician relations.
Article in Scandinavian journal of psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Factors associated with receiving a Functional Disorder diagnostic label: A systematic review.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- Bias and discrimination in healthcare through the eyes of future professionals: a qualitative study of student observations.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- When the diagnosis misses the mark: The psychiatric cost of misdiagnosing hypophosphatasia as fibromyalgia.World journal of clinical cases · 2025Article
- Genetic testing and evidence of a founder mutation in a hotspot for hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Dealing with lipoedema: women's experiences of healthcare, self-care, and treatments-a mixed-methods study.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Migraine in men.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Review
- Case Report: The intersection of psychiatry and medicine: diagnostic and ethical insights from case studies.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Opinions and experience of neurologists and neurology trainees in Saudi Arabia on functional neurological disorders: a survey based study.BMC neurology · 2024Observational
- Unconscious Bias among Health Professionals: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Sex Differences in Oxycodone/Naloxone vs. Tapentadol in Chronic Non-Cancer Pain: An Observational Real-World Study.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Benzodiazepine use disorder: A cross-sectional study at a tertiary care center in Lebanon.Medicine · 2022Article
- Coding linguistic elements in clinical interactions: a step-by-step guide for analyzing communication form.BMC medical research methodology · 2022Article
- "I Just Want to Feel Safe Going to a Doctor": Experiences of Female Patients with Chronic Conditions in Australia.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2022Article
- Epidemiology and Comorbidities of Excoriation Disorder: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Physicians' gender bias in the diagnostic assessment of medically unexplained symptoms and its effect on patient-physician relations.Scandinavian journal of psychology · 2019Article
- The Role of Sex and Gender in Dermatology - From Pathogenesis to Clinical Implications.Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgeryReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nonspecific, functional, and somatoform (NFS) syndromes is an umbrella term for various diagnoses with medically unexplained symptoms. These syndromes are more prevalent among women than among men, and associated with negative preconceptions that can impede rehabilitation. In two studies, we quantitatively assess how patients' gender affects the diagnostic assessment of NFS syndromes, as well as the healthcare experiences of individuals diagnosed with NFS syndromes. In the first study, our vignette-based experiment showed that Swedish general practitioners (N = 90) were gender biased in their diagnostic assessment of NFS syndromes, such that a female patient with back pain was more likely to be assigned a NFS syndrome compared to an otherwise identical male patient. In the second study, a large community sample of Swedish individuals with medically explained (n = 432) and unexplained pain (n = 521) evaluated their treating physician's relational conduct. Even after accounting for a variety of sociodemographic variables and other pain characteristics, women with at least one NFS syndrome percieved their physician's relational conduct as significantly poorer than other women as well as men with and without NFS syndromes. When women's pain is more likely than men's to be assessed as NFS, their rehabilitation could be prolonged as pertient alternative diagnoses and treatments are omittied and their negative healthcare experiences lower their volition to partake and persevere in treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.