Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31124017›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2019

Comparison of risk scores in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in western India: A prospective analysis.

Sanjay Chandnani, Pravin Rathi, Nikhil Sonthalia, Suhas Udgirkar, Shubham Jain, Qais Contractor, Samit Jain, Anupam Kumar Singh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Scoring systems for upper gastrointestinal bleeding: Which one scores better?Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sanjay ChandnaniDepartment of Gastroenterology, Topiwala National Medical College and B Y L Nair Charitable Hospital, Dr Anandrao Laxman Nair Marg, Mumbai, 400 008, India. sanjy.med@gmail.com.
Pravin RathiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Topiwala National Medical College and B Y L Nair Charitable Hospital, Dr Anandrao Laxman Nair Marg, Mumbai, 400 008, India.
Nikhil SonthaliaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Topiwala National Medical College and B Y L Nair Charitable Hospital, Dr Anandrao Laxman Nair Marg, Mumbai, 400 008, India.
Suhas UdgirkarDepartment of Gastroenterology, Topiwala National Medical College and B Y L Nair Charitable Hospital, Dr Anandrao Laxman Nair Marg, Mumbai, 400 008, India.
Shubham JainDepartment of Gastroenterology, Topiwala National Medical College and B Y L Nair Charitable Hospital, Dr Anandrao Laxman Nair Marg, Mumbai, 400 008, India.
Qais ContractorDepartment of Gastroenterology, Topiwala National Medical College and B Y L Nair Charitable Hospital, Dr Anandrao Laxman Nair Marg, Mumbai, 400 008, India.
Samit JainDepartment of Gastroenterology, Topiwala National Medical College and B Y L Nair Charitable Hospital, Dr Anandrao Laxman Nair Marg, Mumbai, 400 008, India.
Anupam Kumar SinghDepartment of Medicine, Santosh Medical College, Ghaziabad, 201 009, India.
Topiwala National Medical College & BYL Nair Charitable Hospital · INSantosh University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo study the upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) characteristics and to validate the Rockall and Glasgow-Blatchford scores (GBS), Progetto Nazionale Emorragica Digestiva (PNED) and albumin, international normalized ratio (INR), mental status, systolic blood pressure, and age > 65 (AIMS65) risk scores in predicting outcomes in patients with UGIB.

methodsThree hundred subjects with hematemesis and/or melena were prospectively enrolled and followed up for 30 days. All patients were assessed by hematological investigations, imaging, and endoscopy and risk scores were calculated.

resultsThe mean age was 43.5 ± 17.2 years, and 207 (69%) were males. Hematemesis was the most common presentation (94%). Variceal bleeding was the most common etiology (47.7%). Thirty patients died (10%) and 50 had rebleeding (16.7%). On univariate analysis, serum albumin ≤ 2.7 gm% (p = 0.008), Glasgow Coma scale ≤ 13.9 (p = 0.001), serum bilirubin > 3 mg/dL (p = 0.004), serum bicarbonate ≤ 15.7 mEq/L (p = 0.001), systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg (p = 0.004), and arterial pH ≤ 7.3 (p = 0.003) were found to be the predictors of mortality. No variable was found significant on multivariate analysis. All four scores were significant in predicting mortality, but Rockall (area under receiver operating characteristic [AUROC] 0.728) was better than others. Rebleeding was better predicted by PNED (modified) (AUROC 0.705). In predicting the need for transfusion and surgical or radiological intervention, GBS score > 0 was significant while score of < 2 classified patients into low risk for mortality with high negative predictive value.

conclusionOur study showed that the variceal bleeding was the commonest cause of UGIB. Rockall score was more significant in predicting mortality while PNED for rebleeding. Low risk for mortality, need for blood transfusion, or interventions were accurately predicted by GBS.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCohort StudiesEsophageal and Gastric VaricesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastrointestinal HemorrhageHematemesisHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesRecurrenceRiskEndoscopyNon-variceal bleedRisk scoresUpper gastrointestinal bleedingVariceal bleed

Identifiers

PMID31124017
OpenAlexW2946243729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.