Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31123982›Full record

ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2019

Deciphering the Epitranscriptomic Signatures in Cell Fate Determination and Development.

Varun Haran, Nibedita Lenka

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Bridging maternal effects and epitranscriptomics: A novel perspective in developmental biology.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2026
    Review
  3. Methylation marks breast cancer metastasis: The roles of mThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Roles of RNA mAmerican journal of cancer research · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. The component of the mJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Varun HaranNational Centre for Cell Science, S. P. Pune University Campus, Ganeshkhind, Pune, 411007, India.
Nibedita LenkaNational Centre for Cell Science, S. P. Pune University Campus, Ganeshkhind, Pune, 411007, India. nibedita@nccs.res.in.ORCID 0000-0002-4022-8136
National Centre for Cell Science · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precise regulation of transcriptome modulates several vital aspects in an organism that includes gene expression, cellular activities and development, and its perturbation ensuing pathological conditions. Around 150 post-transcriptional modifications of RNA have been identified till date, which are evolutionarily conserved and likewise prevalent across RNA classes including messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), ribosomal RNA (rRNA), and detected less frequently in small nuclear RNA (snRNA) and microRNAs (miRNA). Among the RNA modifications documented, N6-methyladenosine (m

Indexed as

5-MethylcytosineAdenosineCell DifferentiationEpigenesis, GeneticHumansRNARNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalTranscriptome5-MethylcytosineAdenosineN-methyladenosineRNACell fateEmbryonic developmentEpitranscriptomicsPost-transcriptional modificationRNA binding proteinStem cells

Identifiers

PMID31123982
OpenAlexW2945108350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.