Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31123979›Full record

ReviewScience and engineering ethics2020

Regulation of Stem Cell Technology in Malaysia: Current Status and Recommendations.

Nishakanthi Gopalan, Siti Nurani Mohd Nor, Mohd Salim Mohamed

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Science and engineering ethics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Regenerative Medicine Therapy in Malaysia: An Update.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  5. Immunomodulation and Regenerative Capacity of MSCs for Long-COVID.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nishakanthi GopalanDepartment of Science and Technology Studies, Faulty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. gopalan.nishakanthi@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3900-4052
Siti Nurani Mohd NorGenovasi University College (GUC), Lot 2A (Gate C) Jalan 13/2, Seksyen 13, 46200, Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.
Mohd Salim MohamedDepartment of Science and Technology Studies, Faulty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stem cell technology is an emerging science field; it is the unique regenerative ability of the pluripotent stem cell which scientists hope would be effective in treating various medical conditions. While it has gained significant advances in research, it is a sensitive subject involving human embryo destruction and human experimentation, which compel governments worldwide to ensure that the related procedures and experiments are conducted ethically. Based on face-to-face interviews with selected Malaysian ethicists, scientists and policymakers, the objectives and effectiveness of the current Guideline for Stem Cell Research and Therapy (2009) are examined. The study's findings show that the guideline is rather ineffective in ensuring good ethical governance of the technology. A greater extent of unethical conduct is likely present in the private medical clinics or laboratories offering stem cell therapies compared with the public medical institutions providing similar services, as the latter are closely monitored by the governmental agencies enforcing the relevant policies and laws. To address concerns over malpractices or unethical conduct, this paper recommends a comprehensive revision of the current stem cell guideline so that adequate provisions exist to regulate the explicit practices of the private and public stem cell sectors, including false advertising and accountability. The newly revised Malaysian stem cell guideline will align with the Guidelines for Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation (2016) of the International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR) containing secular but universal moral rules. However, a regulatory policy formulated to govern the technology remains the main thrust of empowering the guideline for compliance among the stakeholders.

Indexed as

Guidelines as TopicPolicyBiomedical TechnologyHumansMalaysiaMedical TourismPrivate SectorProfessional MisconductPublic SectorReligion and ScienceStem Cell ResearchELSIExploitationGuidelineRegulationRegulatory policyStem cell technology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.