ArticleDrug safety2019
Enabling Data-Driven Clinical Quality Assurance: Predicting Adverse Event Reporting in Clinical Trials Using Machine Learning.
Article in Drug safety, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in healthcare: transforming patient safety with intelligent systems-A systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Governing AI for Pharmacovigilance in Low-Income Countries: Systems Perspective.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Assumption-Agnostic Deep Learning Framework for Holistic Clinical Trial Monitoring.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Article
- Unveiling the Benefits of Artificial Intelligence in Individual, Organizational Management, and the Health/Sector System.Health science reports · 2026Review
- The Adoption and Use of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Clinical Development.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2025Article
- A scoping review of artificial intelligence applications in clinical trial risk assessment.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Optimizing Quality Tolerance Limits Monitoring in Clinical Trials Through Machine Learning Methods.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2025Article
- An Open-Source R Package for Detection of Adverse Events Under-Reporting in Clinical Trials: Implementation and Validation by the IMPALA (Inter coMPany quALity Analytics) Consortium.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2024Article
- Advancing Precision Medicine: A Review of Innovative In Silico Approaches for Drug Development, Clinical Pharmacology and Personalized Healthcare.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Machine Learning in Causal Inference: Application in Pharmacovigilance.Drug safety · 2022Review
- A Study of the Recent Trends of Immunology: Key Challenges, Domains, Applications, Datasets, and Future Directions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Clinical Quality Considerations when Using Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) in Clinical Drug Development.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2021Review
- Clinical Quality in Cancer Research: Strategy to Assess Data Integrity of Germline Variants Inferred from Tumor-Only Testing Sequencing Data.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2021Article
- Follow-up on the Use of Advanced Analytics for Clinical Quality Assurance: Bootstrap Resampling to Enhance Detection of Adverse Event Under-Reporting.Drug safety · 2021Article
- Leveraging analytics to assure quality during the Covid-19 pandemic - The COVACTA clinical study example.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2020Article
- Harnessing the Power of Quality Assurance Data: Can We Use Statistical Modeling for Quality Risk Assessment of Clinical Trials?Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2020Article
- Role of Artificial Intelligence in Patient Safety Outcomes: Systematic Literature Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2020Review
- Follow-Up on the Use of Machine Learning in Clinical Quality Assurance: Can We Detect Adverse Event Under-Reporting in Oncology Trials?Drug safety · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAdverse event (AE) under-reporting has been a recurrent issue raised during health authorities Good Clinical Practices (GCP) inspections and audits. Moreover, safety under-reporting poses a risk to patient safety and data integrity. The current clinical Quality Assurance (QA) practices used to detect AE under-reporting rely heavily on investigator site and study audits. Yet several sponsors and institutions have had repeated findings related to safety reporting, and this has led to delays in regulatory submissions. Recent developments in data management and IT systems allow data scientists to apply techniques such as machine learning to detect AE under-reporting in an automated fashion.
objectiveIn this project, we developed a predictive model that enables Roche/Genentech Quality Program Leads oversight of AE reporting at the program, study, site, and patient level. This project was part of a broader effort at Roche/Genentech Product Development Quality to apply advanced analytics to augment and complement traditional clinical QA approaches.
methodWe used a curated data set from 104 completed Roche/Genentech sponsored clinical studies to train a machine learning model to predict the expected number of AEs. Our final model used 54 features built on patient (e.g., demographics, vitals) and study attributes (e.g., molecule class, disease area).
resultsIn order to evaluate model performance, we tested how well it would detect simulated test cases based on data not used for model training. For relevant simulation scenarios of 25%, 50%, and 75% under-reporting on the site level, our model scored an area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.62, 0.79, and 0.92, respectively.
conclusionThe model has been deployed to evaluate safety reporting performance in a set of ongoing studies in the form of a QA/dashboard cockpit available to Roche Quality Program Leads. Applicability and production performance will be assessed over the next 12-24 months in which we will develop a validation strategy to fully integrate our model into Roche QA processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.