Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31123853›Full record

ArticleRadiation and environmental biophysics2019

Electroporation optimizes the uptake of boron-10 by tumor for boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) mediated by GB-10: a boron biodistribution study in the hamster cheek pouch oral cancer model.

Marcela A Garabalino, Nahuel Olaiz, Agustina Portu, Gisela Saint Martin, Silvia I Thorp, Emiliano C C Pozzi, Paula Curotto, María E Itoiz, Andrea Monti Hughes, Lucas L Colombo and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation and environmental biophysics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Boron neutron capture therapy: Current status and future perspectives.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcela A GarabalinoDepartamento de Radiobiología, Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica, Centro Atómico Constituyentes, Avenida General Paz 1499, B1650KNA, San Martin, Provincia Buenos Aires, Argentina. garabalino@cnea.gov.ar.ORCID 0000-0003-1993-1799
Nahuel OlaizDepartamento de Sistemas complejos, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Universitaria, Pabellón II, C1428EHA, Ciudad Autónoma De Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Agustina PortuDepartamento de Radiobiología, Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica, Centro Atómico Constituyentes, Avenida General Paz 1499, B1650KNA, San Martin, Provincia Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Gisela Saint MartinDepartamento de Radiobiología, Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica, Centro Atómico Constituyentes, Avenida General Paz 1499, B1650KNA, San Martin, Provincia Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Silvia I ThorpSub-gerencia Instrumentación y Control, Centro Atómico Ezeiza, Camino Real Presbítero González y Aragón 15, B1802AYA, Ezeiza, Provincia Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Emiliano C C PozziDepartamento de Reactores de Investigación y Producción, Centro Atómico Ezeiza, Camino Real Presbítero González y Aragón 15, B1802AYA, Ezeiza, Provincia Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Paula CurottoDepartamento de Reactores de Investigación y Producción, Centro Atómico Ezeiza, Camino Real Presbítero González y Aragón 15, B1802AYA, Ezeiza, Provincia Buenos Aires, Argentina.
María E ItoizDepartamento de Anatomía Patología, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Marcelo T. de Alvear 2142, C1122AAH, Ciudad Autónoma De Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Andrea Monti HughesDepartamento de Radiobiología, Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica, Centro Atómico Constituyentes, Avenida General Paz 1499, B1650KNA, San Martin, Provincia Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Lucas L ColomboInstituto de Oncología Angel H. Roffo, Avenida San Martin 5481, C1417DTB, Ciudad Autónoma De Buenos Aires, Argentina.
David W NiggIdaho National Laboratory, 2525 Fremont Ave, Idaho Falls, ID, 83402, USA.
Verónica A TrivillinDepartamento de Radiobiología, Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica, Centro Atómico Constituyentes, Avenida General Paz 1499, B1650KNA, San Martin, Provincia Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Guillermo MarshallDepartamento de Sistemas complejos, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Universitaria, Pabellón II, C1428EHA, Ciudad Autónoma De Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Amanda E SchwintDepartamento de Radiobiología, Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica, Centro Atómico Constituyentes, Avenida General Paz 1499, B1650KNA, San Martin, Provincia Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARCentro Atómico ConstituyentesIdaho National Laboratory · USUniversidad de Buenos Aires · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is a promising cancer binary therapy modality that utilizes the nuclear capture reaction of thermal neutrons by boron-10 resulting in a localized release of high- and low-linear energy transfer (LET) radiation. Electrochemotherapy (ECT) is based on electroporation (EP) that induces opening of pores in cell membranes, allowing the entry of compounds. Because EP is applied locally to a tumor, the compound is incorporated preferentially by tumor cells. Based on the knowledge that the therapeutic success of BNCT depends centrally on the boron content in tumor and normal tissues and that EP has proven to be an excellent facilitator of tumor biodistribution of an anti-tumor agent, the aim of this study was to evaluate if EP can optimize the delivery of boronated compounds. We performed biodistribution studies and qualitative microdistribution analyses of boron employing the boron compound sodium decahydrodecaborate (GB-10) + EP in the hamster cheek pouch oral cancer model. Syrian hamsters with chemically induced exophytic squamous cell carcinomas were used. A typical EP treatment was applied to each tumor, varying the moment of application with respect to the administration of GB-10 (early or late). The results of this study showed a significant increase in the absolute and relative tumor boron concentration and optimization of the qualitative microdistribution of boron by the use of early EP + GB-10 versus GB-10 without EP. This strategy could be a tool to improve the therapeutic efficacy of BNCT/GB-10 in vivo.

Indexed as

AnimalsBoronBoron CompoundsBoron Neutron Capture TherapyCheekCricetinaeDisease Models, AnimalIsotopesMesocricetusMouth NeoplasmsTissue DistributionBoronBoron-10Boron CompoundsdecahydrodecaborateIsotopesBoron biodistributionBoron microdistributionBoron neutron capture therapy (BNCT)Electroporation (EP)Hamster cheek pouch oral cancer modelSodium decahydrodecaborate (GB-10)

Identifiers

PMID31123853
OpenAlexW2945898219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.