ReviewWorld journal of urology2019
Consultation on UTUC, Stockholm 2018: aspects of treatment.
Review in World journal of urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07077447 (DaBlaCa 23 - The European Collaborative Study on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
DaBlaCa 23 - The European Collaborative Study on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endoscopic management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma with laser ablation including Magneto pulse modulation.BJUI compass · 2026Article
- Lymphadenectomy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Clinical insights and controversies (Review).Oncology reports · 2025Review
- Measurement of tissue optical properties in the 400 to 700 nm range to assess light penetration depths for laser treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinomas.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Article
- Recent development and future application of biodegradable ureteral stents.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Experts' recommendations in laser use for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a comprehensive guide by the European Section of Uro-Technology (ESUT) and Training Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.) group.World journal of urology · 2023Article
- Lymph Node Dissection in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Current Status and Future Perspectives.Current oncology reports · 2023Review
- Adjuvant intraluminal therapies for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Review
- Endoscopic Conservative Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma with a Thulium Laser: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Effectiveness and Safety of Thulium Fiber Laser in the Conservative Management of Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.European urology open science · 2022Article
- Article
- Outcome of Non-Muscle Invasive Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Receiving Endoscopic Ablation: An Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial resection of the renal pelvis for urothelial carcinoma: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Article
- Evaluation of Patterns of Presentation, Practice, and Outcomes of Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer: Protocol for an Observational, International, Multicenter, Cohort Study by the Clinical Research Office of the Endourology Society.JMIR research protocols · 2020Article
- Consultation on UTUC Stockholm 2018.World journal of urology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 8 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo provide an overview of treatment modalities for management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).
methodsIn accordance with the standards for a scoping review, data presentation and discussion at the Consultation on UTUC in Stockholm, 6-7 September 2018, consensus was reached on the latest and most important treatment recommendations for UTUC. Using Pubmed, Web of Science, and Embase, publications were selected based on quality, clinical relevance, and level of evidence.
resultsKidney-sparing surgery should be attempted for low-grade UTUC. Radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision is first option for high-grade disease. Post-operative bladder instillation of chemotherapy should be offered after RNU to reduce intravesical recurrence rate. Identification of tumor grade and stage is crucial when selecting treatment. Ureteroscopic management of low-grade and non-invasive UTUC achieves disease-free survival similar to that offered by radical nephroureterectomy but seems to be a risk factor for intravesical recurrence. Lymphadenectomy appears important for high-risk disease, although the therapeutic benefit needs further validation. There is little evidence supporting use of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) and mitomycin C as monotherapy and adjuvant treatment in UTUC. A randomized clinical trial has indicated that platin-based chemotherapy for invasive UTUC improves disease-free survival, suggesting that adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered standard care for ≥ T2 N0-3M0 disease.
conclusionsRisk stratification assessment is feasible and mandatory in UTUC. Identification of tumor grade and stage is essential for optimal treatment selection. Kidney-sparing surgery should be offered in low-risk disease, whereas radical nephroureterectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered in high-risk disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.