ReviewWorld journal of urology2020
Managing complications of collagenase Clostridium histolyticum (CCH) injection.
Review in World journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Acute Lower Back Pain after Intralesional Injection of CollagenaseThe Journal of urology · 2022Article
- The efficacy and safety of intralesional injection of collagenaseFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- The Management of Penile Fracture: a Review of the Literature with Special Consideration for Patients Undergoing Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum Injection Therapy.Current urology reports · 2021Review
- Peyronie's disease in contemporary urological practice.World journal of urology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe introduction of collagenase Clostridium histolyticum (CCH) has revolutionized the treatment of Peyronie's disease. The efficacy of this therapy has been well demonstrated and the safety profile is favorable. However, post-injection complications are poorly characterized and management of these complications lacks standardization.
methodsThis review includes literature published in English and indexed in the PubMed
resultsAdverse effects of therapy are common but generally self-limiting. Penile pain and edema are expected events, and most patients experience hematologic sequelae (bleeding, hematoma, ecchymosis, etc.). The intervention rate for penile hematoma is low. Penile fracture is a morbid complication of therapy that is rare and may be challenging to diagnose given the frequency with which pronounced bruising and swelling are encountered. Imaging is a useful adjunct in situations of diagnostic uncertainty. Alternative injection protocols have been evaluated to limit the cost and morbidity of CCH therapy. Clinical efficacy of these protocols is promising, but prospective evaluation is lacking.
conclusionsNo standardized protocols exist for management of post-injection complications of CCH therapy. The majority of these complications are managed conservatively, but suspected penile fracture should be carefully evaluated and imaging employed when needed. Future prospective studies of alternative injection protocols are warranted to decrease morbidity while maintaining efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.