Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31123824›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2019

Information needs, communication and usage of social media by cancer patients and their relatives.

Lucas Andreas Braun, Bijan Zomorodbakhsch, Christian Keinki, Jutta Huebner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Factors influencing the e-health literacy in cancer patients: a systematic review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Social Media Use for Health Purposes: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Beyond Visibility: Social Media, Trust, and Responsibility in Oncology.Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Evaluating How Patients with Thyroid Cancer Use Online Resources and Social Media to Access Health Information.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lucas Andreas BraunUniversitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Bijan ZomorodbakhschMVZ Onkologische Kooperation Harz, Kösliner Straße 14, 38642, Goslar, Germany.
Christian KeinkiUniversitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Jutta HuebnerUniversitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany. jutta.huebner@med.uni-jena.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4931-568X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate cancer patients' need for information, their communication and usage of social media.

methodsWe developed a standardized questionnaire comprising sections on information needs, communication behavior and usage of social media with respect to cancer and combined this with a validated instrument on eHealth literacy for patients. This questionnaire was provided online and with the help of bloggers and leaders of social media groups, distributed in their networks.

resultsThe Internet was the most important information source (n = 308; 77.4%). Yet, most of the participants wanted to get information from their doctor (n = 342; 85.9%). With respect to trust in a source of information, oncologists were named most often (n = 285; 71.6%). On the one hand, many participants got in contact with others, especially peers, via social media (n = 319; 80.3%) with a growing bond to their family members on the other hand (n = 324; 81.6%). The cancer diagnosis was an impulse for starting with active participation in social media for some participants (n = 196; 49.2%).

conclusionsWith social media gaining importance as source of information for patients, improving the quality of information in these networks is an important task in health care systems.

Indexed as

CommunicationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGermanyHealth LiteracyHumansInformation Seeking BehaviorInternetMaleMiddle AgedNeeds AssessmentNeoplasmsSocial MediaSurveys and QuestionnairesCancereHealth literacyeHealth servicePatient informationSocial media

Identifiers

PMID31123824
PMCPMC11810420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.